[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/66] drm/i915: Drop dev from pte_encode
Ben Widawsky
ben at bwidawsk.net
Fri Jun 28 01:30:19 CEST 2013
The original pte_encode function needed the dev argument so we could do
platform specific handling via IS_GENX, etc. With the merging of a pte
encoding function there should never been a need to quirk away gen
specific details.
The patch doesn't do much but makes the upcoming reworks in gtt/ppgtt/mm
slightly (albeit, ever so) easier.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth at whitecape.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 6 ++----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 21 ++++++++-------------
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 229a5d7..efd244d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -479,8 +479,7 @@ struct i915_gtt {
struct sg_table *st,
unsigned int pg_start,
enum i915_cache_level cache_level);
- gen6_gtt_pte_t (*pte_encode)(struct drm_device *dev,
- dma_addr_t addr,
+ gen6_gtt_pte_t (*pte_encode)(dma_addr_t addr,
enum i915_cache_level level);
};
#define gtt_total_entries(gtt) ((gtt).total >> PAGE_SHIFT)
@@ -501,8 +500,7 @@ struct i915_hw_ppgtt {
struct sg_table *st,
unsigned int pg_start,
enum i915_cache_level cache_level);
- gen6_gtt_pte_t (*pte_encode)(struct drm_device *dev,
- dma_addr_t addr,
+ gen6_gtt_pte_t (*pte_encode)(dma_addr_t addr,
enum i915_cache_level level);
int (*enable)(struct drm_device *dev);
void (*cleanup)(struct i915_hw_ppgtt *ppgtt);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
index 42e80b4..746b649 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
@@ -45,8 +45,7 @@
#define GEN6_PTE_CACHE_LLC_MLC (3 << 1)
#define GEN6_PTE_ADDR_ENCODE(addr) GEN6_GTT_ADDR_ENCODE(addr)
-static gen6_gtt_pte_t gen6_pte_encode(struct drm_device *dev,
- dma_addr_t addr,
+static gen6_gtt_pte_t gen6_pte_encode(dma_addr_t addr,
enum i915_cache_level level)
{
gen6_gtt_pte_t pte = GEN6_PTE_VALID;
@@ -72,8 +71,7 @@ static gen6_gtt_pte_t gen6_pte_encode(struct drm_device *dev,
#define BYT_PTE_WRITEABLE (1 << 1)
#define BYT_PTE_SNOOPED_BY_CPU_CACHES (1 << 2)
-static gen6_gtt_pte_t byt_pte_encode(struct drm_device *dev,
- dma_addr_t addr,
+static gen6_gtt_pte_t byt_pte_encode(dma_addr_t addr,
enum i915_cache_level level)
{
gen6_gtt_pte_t pte = GEN6_PTE_VALID;
@@ -90,8 +88,7 @@ static gen6_gtt_pte_t byt_pte_encode(struct drm_device *dev,
return pte;
}
-static gen6_gtt_pte_t hsw_pte_encode(struct drm_device *dev,
- dma_addr_t addr,
+static gen6_gtt_pte_t hsw_pte_encode(dma_addr_t addr,
enum i915_cache_level level)
{
gen6_gtt_pte_t pte = GEN6_PTE_VALID;
@@ -196,8 +193,7 @@ static void gen6_ppgtt_clear_range(struct i915_hw_ppgtt *ppgtt,
unsigned first_pte = first_entry % I915_PPGTT_PT_ENTRIES;
unsigned last_pte, i;
- scratch_pte = ppgtt->pte_encode(ppgtt->dev,
- dev_priv->gtt.scratch.addr,
+ scratch_pte = ppgtt->pte_encode(dev_priv->gtt.scratch.addr,
I915_CACHE_LLC);
while (num_entries) {
@@ -233,8 +229,7 @@ static void gen6_ppgtt_insert_entries(struct i915_hw_ppgtt *ppgtt,
dma_addr_t page_addr;
page_addr = sg_page_iter_dma_address(&sg_iter);
- pt_vaddr[act_pte] = ppgtt->pte_encode(ppgtt->dev, page_addr,
- cache_level);
+ pt_vaddr[act_pte] = ppgtt->pte_encode(page_addr, cache_level);
if (++act_pte == I915_PPGTT_PT_ENTRIES) {
kunmap_atomic(pt_vaddr);
act_pt++;
@@ -486,7 +481,7 @@ static void gen6_ggtt_insert_entries(struct drm_device *dev,
for_each_sg_page(st->sgl, &sg_iter, st->nents, 0) {
addr = sg_page_iter_dma_address(&sg_iter);
- iowrite32(dev_priv->gtt.pte_encode(dev, addr, level),
+ iowrite32(dev_priv->gtt.pte_encode(addr, level),
>t_entries[i]);
i++;
}
@@ -499,7 +494,7 @@ static void gen6_ggtt_insert_entries(struct drm_device *dev,
*/
if (i != 0)
WARN_ON(readl(>t_entries[i-1])
- != dev_priv->gtt.pte_encode(dev, addr, level));
+ != dev_priv->gtt.pte_encode(addr, level));
/* This next bit makes the above posting read even more important. We
* want to flush the TLBs only after we're certain all the PTE updates
@@ -527,7 +522,7 @@ static void gen6_ggtt_clear_range(struct drm_device *dev,
first_entry, num_entries, max_entries))
num_entries = max_entries;
- scratch_pte = dev_priv->gtt.pte_encode(dev, dev_priv->gtt.scratch.addr,
+ scratch_pte = dev_priv->gtt.pte_encode(dev_priv->gtt.scratch.addr,
I915_CACHE_LLC);
for (i = 0; i < num_entries; i++)
iowrite32(scratch_pte, >t_base[i]);
--
1.8.3.1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list