[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] lib: Make sure we can also use the short form of the subtest options

Damien Lespiau damien.lespiau at intel.com
Fri Mar 22 11:25:41 CET 2013


On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 08:14:39PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> My original thinking behind only allowing the long option name is to
> avoid collisions with cmdline options for the test executable itself.
> E.g. when we'd teach testdisplay a few different default runs, but you
> could still dig into all the fancy modes through cmdline options.
> Similar for gem_stress.

Oh, yes, makes sense and it's a good idea, never mind then.

-- 
Damien



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list