[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Correct sandybrige overclocking
Daniel Vetter
daniel at ffwll.ch
Sun Mar 24 13:06:57 CET 2013
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 12:56 AM, Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net> wrote:
>> Apparently massive overclocking like that makes your system die
>> prematurely in a crash. So 3.10 it is, imo.
>> -Daniel
>
> It's like all overclocking I guess, we simply give the user an
> opportunity to shoot themselves in the foot. Glad to hear it is actually
> doing something though.
>
> I agree that 3.10 sounds right; I'm thinking we'll want a module
> parameter or something as well, to prevent spurious bug reports. What do
> you think?
I think not having a module option is ok, I don't expect that the
enthusiast boards required to adjust the limits are that common. So it
shouldn't affect more than just a few users, and those it does affect
should know what their doing. Module options after all don't prevent
them from setting unstable rc6 options, either ;-)
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list