[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/18] drm/i915: Add VECS semaphore bits

Ben Widawsky ben at bwidawsk.net
Wed May 8 07:59:56 CEST 2013


On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 03:49:18PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 05:59:15PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > Like the other rings, the VECS supports semaphores. The semaphore stuff
> > is a bit wonky so this patch on it's own should be nice for review.
> > 
> > This patch should have no functional impact.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h         | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c |  9 +++++---
> >  2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > index 5be4a75..3899f71 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > @@ -267,13 +267,19 @@
> >  #define  MI_SEMAPHORE_UPDATE	    (1<<21)
> >  #define  MI_SEMAPHORE_COMPARE	    (1<<20)
> >  #define  MI_SEMAPHORE_REGISTER	    (1<<18)
> > -#define  MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_RB	    (0<<16) /* RCS wait for BCS  (BRSYNC) */
> > -#define  MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_RV	    (2<<16) /* RCS wait for VCS  (VRSYNC) */
> > -#define  MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VR	    (0<<16) /* VCS wait for RCS  (RVSYNC) */
> > -#define  MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VB	    (2<<16) /* VCS wait for BCS  (BVSYNC) */
> > -#define  MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_BV	    (0<<16) /* BCS wait for VCS  (VBSYNC) */
> > -#define  MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_BR	    (2<<16) /* BCS wait for RCS  (RBSYNC) */
> > -#define  MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID  (1<<0)
> > +#define  MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VR	    (0<<16) /* VCS  wait for RCS  (RVSYNC) */
> > +#define  MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VER	    (1<<16) /* VECS wait for RCS  (RVESYNC) */
> > +#define  MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_BR	    (2<<16) /* BCS  wait for RCS  (RBSYNC) */
> > +#define  MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_BV	    (0<<16) /* BCS  wait for VCS  (VBSYNC) */
> > +#define  MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VEV	    (1<<16) /* VECS wait for VCS  (VVESYNC) */
> > +#define  MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_RV	    (2<<16) /* RCS  wait for VCS  (VRSYNC) */
> > +#define  MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_RB	    (0<<16) /* RCS  wait for BCS  (BRSYNC) */
> > +#define  MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VEB	    (1<<16) /* VECS wait for BCS  (BVESYNC) */
> > +#define  MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VB	    (2<<16) /* VCS  wait for BCS  (BVSYNC) */
> > +#define  MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_BVE	    (0<<16) /* BCS  wait for VECS (VEBSYNC) */
> > +#define  MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VVE	    (1<<16) /* VCS  wait for VECS (VEVSYNC) */
> > +#define  MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_RVE	    (2<<16) /* RCS  wait for VECS (VERSYNC) */
> > +#define  MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID  (3<<16)
> 
> Same thing as in patch 1, I think the registers are the other way
> around.

Yep, fixed.

> 
> >  /*
> >   * 3D instructions used by the kernel
> >   */
> > @@ -556,6 +562,7 @@
> >  #define RENDER_RING_BASE	0x02000
> >  #define BSD_RING_BASE		0x04000
> >  #define GEN6_BSD_RING_BASE	0x12000
> > +#define VEBOX_RING_BASE		0x1a000
> >  #define BLT_RING_BASE		0x22000
> >  #define RING_TAIL(base)		((base)+0x30)
> >  #define RING_HEAD(base)		((base)+0x34)
> > @@ -563,13 +570,20 @@
> >  #define RING_CTL(base)		((base)+0x3c)
> >  #define RING_SYNC_0(base)	((base)+0x40)
> >  #define RING_SYNC_1(base)	((base)+0x44)
> > -#define GEN6_RVSYNC (RING_SYNC_0(RENDER_RING_BASE))
> > -#define GEN6_RBSYNC (RING_SYNC_1(RENDER_RING_BASE))
> > -#define GEN6_VRSYNC (RING_SYNC_1(GEN6_BSD_RING_BASE))
> > -#define GEN6_VBSYNC (RING_SYNC_0(GEN6_BSD_RING_BASE))
> > -#define GEN6_BRSYNC (RING_SYNC_0(BLT_RING_BASE))
> > +#define RING_SYNC_2(base)	((base)+0x48)
> > +#define GEN6_RVSYNC	(RING_SYNC_0(RENDER_RING_BASE))
> > +#define GEN6_RBSYNC	(RING_SYNC_1(RENDER_RING_BASE))
> > +#define GEN6_RVESYNC	(RING_SYNC_2(RENDER_RING_BASE))
> > +#define GEN6_VBSYNC	(RING_SYNC_0(GEN6_BSD_RING_BASE))
> > +#define GEN6_VRSYNC	(RING_SYNC_1(GEN6_BSD_RING_BASE))
> > +#define GEN6_VVESYNC	(RING_SYNC_2(GEN6_BSD_RING_BASE))
> > +#define GEN6_BRSYNC	(RING_SYNC_0(BLT_RING_BASE))
> > +#define GEN6_BVSYNC	(RING_SYNC_1(BLT_RING_BASE))
> > +#define GEN6_BVESYNC	(RING_SYNC_2(BLT_RING_BASE))
> > +#define GEN6_VEBSYNC	(RING_SYNC_0(VEBOX_RING_BASE))
> > +#define GEN6_VERSYNC	(RING_SYNC_1(VEBOX_RING_BASE))
> > +#define GEN6_VEVSYNC	(RING_SYNC_2(VEBOX_RING_BASE))
> >  #define GEN6_NOSYNC 0
> > -#define GEN6_BVSYNC (RING_SYNC_1(BLT_RING_BASE))
> >  #define RING_MAX_IDLE(base)	((base)+0x54)
> >  #define RING_HWS_PGA(base)	((base)+0x80)
> >  #define RING_HWS_PGA_GEN6(base)	((base)+0x2080)
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> > index 555f8b8..b597d1e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> > @@ -654,9 +654,6 @@ gen6_ring_sync(struct intel_ring_buffer *waiter,
> >  	 */
> >  	seqno -= 1;
> >  
> > -	WARN_ON(signaller->semaphore_register[waiter->id] ==
> > -		MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID);
> > -
> 
> Hum, this WARN_ON() is still valid isn't it?

I must have killed this by accident while rebasing. It is indeed valid. Nice catch.

> 
> >  	ret = intel_ring_begin(waiter, 4);
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		return ret;
> > @@ -1678,9 +1675,11 @@ int intel_init_render_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev)
> >  		ring->semaphore_register[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID;
> >  		ring->semaphore_register[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_RV;
> >  		ring->semaphore_register[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_RB;
> > +		ring->semaphore_register[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_RVE;
> >  		ring->signal_mbox[RCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC;
> >  		ring->signal_mbox[VCS] = GEN6_VRSYNC;
> >  		ring->signal_mbox[BCS] = GEN6_BRSYNC;
> > +		ring->signal_mbox[VECS] = GEN6_VERSYNC;
> >  	} else if (IS_GEN5(dev)) {
> >  		ring->add_request = pc_render_add_request;
> >  		ring->flush = gen4_render_ring_flush;
> > @@ -1838,9 +1837,11 @@ int intel_init_bsd_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev)
> >  		ring->semaphore_register[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VR;
> >  		ring->semaphore_register[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID;
> >  		ring->semaphore_register[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VB;
> > +		ring->semaphore_register[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VEV;
> 
> MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VVE here?

Weird. I remember Haihao had caught this typo earlier, and I fixed it
earlier. I'm beginning to fear I may have rebased the wrong branch...

Anyway, thanks for finding it again.

Got all the fixes locally. Will send when I'm done with the other
changes.

> 
> >  		ring->signal_mbox[RCS] = GEN6_RVSYNC;
> >  		ring->signal_mbox[VCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC;
> >  		ring->signal_mbox[BCS] = GEN6_BVSYNC;
> > +		ring->signal_mbox[VECS] = GEN6_VEVSYNC;
> >  	} else {
> >  		ring->mmio_base = BSD_RING_BASE;
> >  		ring->flush = bsd_ring_flush;
> > @@ -1885,9 +1886,11 @@ int intel_init_blt_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev)
> >  	ring->semaphore_register[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_BR;
> >  	ring->semaphore_register[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_BV;
> >  	ring->semaphore_register[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID;
> > +	ring->semaphore_register[VECS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_BVE;
> >  	ring->signal_mbox[RCS] = GEN6_RBSYNC;
> >  	ring->signal_mbox[VCS] = GEN6_VBSYNC;
> >  	ring->signal_mbox[BCS] = GEN6_NOSYNC;
> > +	ring->signal_mbox[VECS] = GEN6_VEBSYNC;
> >  	ring->init = init_ring_common;
> >  
> >  	return intel_init_ring_buffer(dev, ring);
> > -- 
> > 1.8.2.1
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list