[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: panel fitter hw state readout&check support
Mika Kuoppala
mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com
Fri May 10 13:37:59 CEST 2013
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> writes:
> Pfit state readout is a bit ugly on gen2/3 due to the intermingling
> with the lvds state, but alas.
>
> Also note that since state is always cleared to zero we can
> unconditonally compare all the state and completely neglect the actual
> platform we're running on.
>
> v2: Properly check for the pfit power domain on haswell.
>
> v3: Don't check pgm_ratios on gen4+, they're auto-computed by the hw.
>
> v4: Properly clear the lvds border bits, upset the state checker a
> bit.
>
> v5: Unconditionally read out panel dither settings on gen2/3.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index bfbb484..58395e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -4967,6 +4967,36 @@ static int i9xx_crtc_mode_set(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static void i9xx_get_pfit_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> + struct intel_crtc_config *pipe_config)
> +{
> + struct drm_device *dev = crtc->base.dev;
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> + uint32_t tmp;
> +
> + tmp = I915_READ(PFIT_CONTROL);
You could do
const uint32_t ctl = I915_READ(PFIT_CONTROL);
and...
> + if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 4) {
> + if (crtc->pipe != PIPE_B)
> + return;
> +
> + /* gen2/3 store dither state in pfit control, needs to match */
> + pipe_config->gmch_pfit.control = tmp & PANEL_8TO6_DITHER_ENABLE;
> + } else {
> + if ((tmp & PFIT_PIPE_MASK) != (crtc->pipe << PFIT_PIPE_SHIFT))
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (!(tmp & PFIT_ENABLE))
> + return;
> +
> + pipe_config->gmch_pfit.control = I915_READ(PFIT_CONTROL);
and use ctl in here to avoid extra read.
> + pipe_config->gmch_pfit.pgm_ratios = I915_READ(PFIT_PGM_RATIOS);
> + if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 5)
> + pipe_config->gmch_pfit.lvds_border_bits =
> + I915_READ(LVDS) & LVDS_BORDER_ENABLE;
> +}
> +
> static bool i9xx_get_pipe_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> struct intel_crtc_config *pipe_config)
> {
> @@ -4980,6 +5010,8 @@ static bool i9xx_get_pipe_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>
> intel_get_pipe_timings(crtc, pipe_config);
>
> + i9xx_get_pfit_config(crtc, pipe_config);
> +
> return true;
> }
>
> @@ -5815,6 +5847,21 @@ static void ironlake_get_fdi_m_n_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> & TU_SIZE_MASK) >> TU_SIZE_SHIFT) + 1;
> }
>
> +static void ironlake_get_pfit_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> + struct intel_crtc_config *pipe_config)
> +{
> + struct drm_device *dev = crtc->base.dev;
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> + uint32_t tmp;
> +
> + tmp = I915_READ(PF_CTL(crtc->pipe));
> +
> + if (tmp & PF_ENABLE) {
> + pipe_config->pch_pfit.pos = I915_READ(PF_WIN_POS(crtc->pipe));
> + pipe_config->pch_pfit.size = I915_READ(PF_WIN_SZ(crtc->pipe));
> + }
> +}
> +
> static bool ironlake_get_pipe_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> struct intel_crtc_config *pipe_config)
> {
> @@ -5838,6 +5885,8 @@ static bool ironlake_get_pipe_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>
> intel_get_pipe_timings(crtc, pipe_config);
>
> + ironlake_get_pfit_config(crtc, pipe_config);
> +
> return true;
> }
>
> @@ -5957,6 +6006,7 @@ static bool haswell_get_pipe_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> struct drm_device *dev = crtc->base.dev;
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = crtc->config.cpu_transcoder;
> + enum intel_display_power_domain pfit_domain;
> uint32_t tmp;
>
> if (!intel_display_power_enabled(dev,
> @@ -5986,6 +6036,10 @@ static bool haswell_get_pipe_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>
> intel_get_pipe_timings(crtc, pipe_config);
>
> + pfit_domain = POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE_PANEL_FITTER(crtc->pipe);
> + if (intel_display_power_enabled(dev, pfit_domain))
> + ironlake_get_pfit_config(crtc, pipe_config);
> +
> return true;
> }
>
> @@ -7961,7 +8015,8 @@ intel_modeset_update_state(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned prepare_pipes)
> if (mask & (1 <<(intel_crtc)->pipe))
>
> static bool
> -intel_pipe_config_compare(struct intel_crtc_config *current_config,
> +intel_pipe_config_compare(struct drm_device *dev,
> + struct intel_crtc_config *current_config,
> struct intel_crtc_config *pipe_config)
> {
> #define PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(name) \
> @@ -8010,6 +8065,14 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(struct intel_crtc_config *current_config,
> PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(requested_mode.hdisplay);
> PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(requested_mode.vdisplay);
>
> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(gmch_pfit.control);
> + /* pfit ratios are autocomputed by the hw on gen4+ */
> + if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 4)
> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(gmch_pfit.pgm_ratios);
> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(gmch_pfit.lvds_border_bits);
> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(pch_pfit.pos);
> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(pch_pfit.size);
> +
For ironlake+ we don't get conf checking for the control register part.
Should we?
> #undef PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I
> #undef PIPE_CONF_CHECK_FLAGS
>
> @@ -8121,7 +8184,7 @@ intel_modeset_check_state(struct drm_device *dev)
> "(expected %i, found %i)\n", crtc->active, active);
>
> WARN(active &&
> - !intel_pipe_config_compare(&crtc->config, &pipe_config),
> + !intel_pipe_config_compare(dev, &crtc->config, &pipe_config),
> "pipe state doesn't match!\n");
> }
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
> index d256fe4..3294efd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
> @@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ static void intel_pre_pll_enable_lvds(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> }
>
> /* set the corresponsding LVDS_BORDER bit */
> + temp &= ~LVDS_BORDER_ENABLE;
> temp |= intel_crtc->config.gmch_pfit.lvds_border_bits;
> /* Set the B0-B3 data pairs corresponding to whether we're going to
> * set the DPLLs for dual-channel mode or not.
> --
> 1.7.11.7
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list