[Intel-gfx] [alsa-devel] [PATCH 5/5] ALSA/i915: Check power well API existense before calling

David Henningsson david.henningsson at canonical.com
Mon May 13 17:37:11 CEST 2013


On 05/13/2013 03:50 PM, Wang, Xingchao wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Henningsson [mailto:david.henningsson at canonical.com]
>> Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 8:13 PM
>> To: Wang, Xingchao
>> Cc: Wang Xingchao; alsa-devel at alsa-project.org; daniel at ffwll.ch;
>> tiwai at suse.de; Lin, Mengdong; intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; Li, Jocelyn;
>> Barnes, Jesse; Girdwood, Liam R; Zanoni, Paulo R
>> Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 5/5] ALSA/i915: Check power well API
>> existense before calling
>>
>> On 05/13/2013 01:55 PM, Wang, Xingchao wrote:
>>> Hi David,
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: alsa-devel-bounces at alsa-project.org
>>>> [mailto:alsa-devel-bounces at alsa-project.org] On Behalf Of David
>>>> Henningsson
>>>> Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 4:29 PM
>>>> To: Wang Xingchao
>>>> Cc: alsa-devel at alsa-project.org; daniel at ffwll.ch; tiwai at suse.de; Lin,
>>>> Mengdong; intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; Li, Jocelyn; Barnes,
>>>> Jesse; Girdwood, Liam R; Zanoni, Paulo R
>>>> Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 5/5] ALSA/i915: Check power well API
>>>> existense before calling
>>>>
>>>> On 05/13/2013 09:37 AM, Wang Xingchao wrote:
>>>>> I915 module maybe loaded after snd_hda_intel, the power-well API
>>>>> doesnot exist in such case. This patch intended to avoid loading
>>>>> dependency between snd-hda-intel and i915 module.
>>>>
>>>> Hi Xingchao and thanks for working on this.
>>>>
>>>> This patch seems to re-do some of the work done in other patches (a
>>>> lot of lines removed), so it's a little hard to follow. But I'll try
>>>> to write some overall comments on how I have envisioned things...
>>>>
>>>> 1. I don't think there's any need to create an additional kernel
>>>> module, we can just let hda_i915.c be in the snd-hda-intel.ko module,
>>>> and only compile it if
>>>> DRM_I915 is defined.
>>>>
>>>> 2. We don't need an IS_HSW macro on the audio side. Instead declare a
>>>> new AZX_DCAPS_NEED_I915_POWER (or similar) driver quirk.
>>>>
>>>> 3. Somewhere in the beginning of the probing in hda_intel.c, we'll
>>>> need something like:
>>>>
>>>> if (driver_caps & AZX_DCAPS_NEED_I915_POWER)
>>>>      hda_i915_init(chip);
>>>>
>>>> 4. The hda_i915_init does not need to be exported (they're now both
>>>> in the same module). hda_i915.h could have something like:
>>>>
>>>> #ifdef DRM_I915
>>>>      void hda_i915_init(chip);
>>>> #else
>>>>      #define hda_i915_init(chip) do {} while(0) #endif
>>
>> Or perhaps even better
>>
>> static inline void hda_i915_init(azx *chip) {}
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks your suggestions. Will change them in next version.
>>>>
>>>> 5. You're saying this patch is about avoid loading dependency between
>>>> snd-hda-intel and i915 module. That does not make sense to me, since
>>>> the powerwell API is in the i915 module, snd-hda-intel must load it
>>>> when it wants to enable power on haswell, right? Thus there is a
>>>> loading dependency. If the i915 module is not loaded at that point,
>>>> we must wait for it to load, so we can have proper power, instead of
>> continuing probing without the power well?
>>>>
>>>
>>> If i915 module not loaded, snd-had-intel will load it in current code.
>>> The question is the tolerant delay of waiting for i915 loading.
>>
>> Could you explain in more detail, what you mean with "tolerant delay"
>> and what will happen if you exceed that delay?
>
> You said " If the i915 module is not loaded at that point, we must wait for it to load".
> I'm not clear about the routine, how long will snd-hda-intel wait? What would happen if loading i915 too long time?
> How will snd-hda-intel get to know the i915 loading finished?

I'm not experienced in module loading either, but I believe 
"request_module" load the i915 driver and not return until i915 has 
finished loading?

Note: You should get rid of the backwards reference (as Jaroslav pointed 
out), because not only is it not needed, it could potentially cause a 
deadlock if the i915 and snd-hda-intel modules both try to load each other.



-- 
David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd.
https://launchpad.net/~diwic



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list