[Intel-gfx] intel_drv.so segfault

[Grant]

>>>>>> Thank you, here's what I get:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # addr2line -e /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/intel_drv.so -i 0x2fe79 0x3037f
>
> Grant - I'm assuming that this was done on the emerged
> xf86-video-intel, not the git-compiled one?

Yes, that is correct.  I emerged the git-compiled one too with a -9999
ebuild from the x11 overlay but that was replaced a week ago.

>>>>>> /var/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel-2.99.905-r1/work/xf86-video-intel-2.99.905/src/sna/sna_accel.c:6079
>
> git blame shows sna_accel.c:6079 (as of the 2.99.905 tag) last touched
> by 85fdc314
>
>>>>>> /var/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel-2.99.905-r1/work/xf86-video-intel-2.99.905/src/sna/sna_accel.c:6240
>
> git blame shows sna_accel.c:6240 (as of the 2.99.905 tag) last touched
> by 07a46333
>
> Also note that xf86-video-intel-2.99.905-r1 has a backport patch of
> 8e44b1f5543f6d36c33c743f1ba2143514f8afbf (sna: Fix canonical mode name
> to correctly use asprintf) applied that touches sna/sna_display.c

I actually just emerged xf86-video-intel-2.99.905-r1 for the first
time today, I'd been using 2.99.905.  It sounds like that might fix
it?

- Grant


>>>>> I need to know what commit id that corresponds to as well. Thanks,
>>>>> -Chris
>>>>
>>>> I'm sorry Chris, I'm just a lowly user.  How can I get that info for you?
>>>
>>> I happen to have a few Gentoo systems sitting under my desk - if you
>>> can send me the output of
>>>
>>> emerge -pv xf86-video-intel
>>>
>>> I can assist with backtracking that to a specific commit.
>>>
>>> -James
>>
>> Many thanks James!
>>
>> # emerge -pv xf86-video-intel
>> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>> Calculating dependencies... done!
>> [ebuild   R   ~] x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel-2.99.905-r1  USE="dri
>> sna udev -glamor -uxa -xvmc" 0 kB
>> Total: 1 package (1 reinstall), Size of downloads: 0 kB
>>
>> - Grant