[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] gem_pin: Be explicit about GGTT needs

[Ben Widawsky]

On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 09:33:06AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 08:05:02PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > This test assumes that using gem_pin will pin in the same address space
> > used by execbuf. Since pin is for the global GTT only, use the existing
> > flag to notify i915.ko that the exec object is special.
> > 
> > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net>
> > ---
> >  tests/gem_pin.c | 4 +++-
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tests/gem_pin.c b/tests/gem_pin.c
> > index 273315f..ca48a04 100644
> > --- a/tests/gem_pin.c
> > +++ b/tests/gem_pin.c
> > @@ -45,6 +45,8 @@
> >  #define BLT_WRITE_ALPHA         (1<<21)
> >  #define BLT_WRITE_RGB           (1<<20)
> >  
> > +#define LOCAL__EXEC_OBJ_NEEDS_GTT (1<<1)
> > +
> >  static void exec(int fd, uint32_t handle, uint32_t offset)
> >  {
> >  	struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 execbuf;
> > @@ -63,7 +65,7 @@ static void exec(int fd, uint32_t handle, uint32_t offset)
> >  	gem_exec[0].relocs_ptr = (uintptr_t) gem_reloc;
> >  	gem_exec[0].alignment = 0;
> >  	gem_exec[0].offset = 0;
> > -	gem_exec[0].flags = 0;
> > +	gem_exec[0].flags = LOCAL__EXEC_OBJ_NEEDS_GTT;
> 
> This only really works with the aliasing ppgtt stuff on gen6, I'd just
> skip the test -it's not really useful with real ppgtt.
> -Daniel

It is really useful with real ppgtt. Please rethink your assertion.

> 
> >  	gem_exec[0].rsvd1 = 0;
> >  	gem_exec[0].rsvd2 = 0;
> >  
> > -- 
> > 1.8.4.2
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> 
> -- 
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch

-- 
Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center