[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915: add i915_get_reset_stats_ioctl

Daniel Vetter daniel at ffwll.ch
Fri Nov 8 07:32:05 CET 2013


On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 6:48 AM, Dave Airlie <airlied at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Ian Romanick <idr at freedesktop.org> wrote:
>>> On 10/27/2013 05:30 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:42:35PM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
>>>>> Since the Mesa merge window is closing soon, I'm finally getting back on
>>>>> this.  I've pushed a rebase of my old Mesa branch to my fd.o repo
>>>>>
>>>>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~idr/mesa/log/?h=robustness3
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a couple questions...
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Has any of this landed an a kernel tree anywhere?
>>>>
>>>> Afaik everything but the actual ioctl and i-g-t testcase has landed.
>>>
>>> And that stuff will land once my patches hit the Mesa list or ... ?
>>
>> Yup.
>
> Hey kernel first, then upstream projects, at the moment libdrm has
> ioctls in it that I have no upstream solid kernel commit for,
>
> Either in the next 24 hrs I have this in my tree or the libdrm commits
> need to be reverted,
>
> and if someone releases libdrm in that time span then I'm going to be
> quite pissed.

It's kinda too late imo for 3.13 (and there's an open question whether
we need one more flag or not), so I wanted to pull it in into 3.14.
Which also gives us plenty of time to add or not add that optional
flag. So I guess time to revert. Can you do that pls?
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list