[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/bdw: Add BDW to ULT macro

[Daniel Vetter]

On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 10:20:06AM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> For what we care about ULT and ULX are interchangeable. We know of 3
> types of pciids for these cases. I am not sure if at some point we will
> need to distinguish ULT and ULX.
> 
> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net>

I think for -next we want a is_ult flag in our info struct. On modern
platform this seems to be a much more useful disdinction than the
is_mobile stuff from the gen2/3 days we still use ;-)

Merged into bdw-fixes, thanks for the patch.
-Daniel

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 7 ++++++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 9944b26..8396eec 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -1750,8 +1750,13 @@ struct drm_i915_file_private {
>  #define IS_MOBILE(dev)		(INTEL_INFO(dev)->is_mobile)
>  #define IS_HSW_EARLY_SDV(dev)	(IS_HASWELL(dev) && \
>  				 ((dev)->pdev->device & 0xFF00) == 0x0C00)
> -#define IS_ULT(dev)		(IS_HASWELL(dev) && \
> +#define IS_BDW_ULT(dev)		(IS_BROADWELL(dev) && \
> +				 (((dev)->pdev->device & 0xf) == 0x2  || \
> +				 ((dev)->pdev->device & 0xf) == 0x6 || \
> +				 ((dev)->pdev->device & 0xf) == 0xe))
> +#define IS_HSW_ULT(dev)		(IS_HASWELL(dev) && \
>  				 ((dev)->pdev->device & 0xFF00) == 0x0A00)
> +#define IS_ULT(dev)		(IS_HSW_ULT(dev) || IS_BDW_ULT(dev))
>  #define IS_HSW_GT3(dev)		(IS_HASWELL(dev) && \
>  				 ((dev)->pdev->device & 0x00F0) == 0x0020)
>  #define IS_PRELIMINARY_HW(intel_info) ((intel_info)->is_preliminary)
> -- 
> 1.8.4.2
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch