[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Make AGP=n work even on gen3

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 09:21:44PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 08:59:56PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 09:35:17AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > Most platforms din't hit this condition, but if we want to allow
> > > building without agp we should also make this allowed on gen3.
> > > 
> > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > > index 38a344694e35..d7c922051c89 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > > @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ static struct drm_driver driver;
> > >  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_AGP_INTEL)
> > >  extern int intel_agp_enabled;
> > >  #else
> > > -static int intel_agp_enabled;
> > > +static int intel_agp_enabled = 1;
> > 
> > Patch 2/3 eliminates our only use of intel_agp_enabled, so this patch
> > seems pointless.
> 
> Patch 2 has a good chance to get reverted, so having this separate isn't
> completely pointless. Should have mentioned this in the cover letter ;-)

OK, makes sense.

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC