[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] tests: Document per-ring naming conventions

[Daniel Vetter]

Inspired by the recent pile of tests for the CS, which doesn't split
up the tests into per-ring subtests.

Cc: bradley.d.volkin at intel.com
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
---
 tests/NAMING-CONVENTION | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tests/NAMING-CONVENTION b/tests/NAMING-CONVENTION
index f08e2828022a..8fc6548db067 100644
--- a/tests/NAMING-CONVENTION
+++ b/tests/NAMING-CONVENTION
@@ -61,3 +61,7 @@ machine isn't configured properly there should be a first subtest to just check
 for that.
 
 ctx: Tests that exercise the hw context support.
+
+render/blt/bsd/vebox: Tests which apply to individual rings should use these
+suffixes. They're a bit inconsistent and historically grown, but they new Bspec
+names (RCS, BCS, VCS and VECS) aren't really clearer.
-- 
1.8.1.4