[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 08/10] drm/i915: Don't write IVB_FBC_RT_BASE
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Wed Nov 27 16:24:05 CET 2013
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
We use nuking instead of render tracking on IVB+, so there's
no point in writing IVB_FBC_RT_BASE.
v2: Drop the IVB_FBC_RT_BASE write too
v3: Move the SNB stuff elsewhere, leaving only IVB+ here
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 5619898..059245e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -260,8 +260,6 @@ static void gen7_enable_fbc(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = intel_fb->obj;
struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
- I915_WRITE(IVB_FBC_RT_BASE, i915_gem_obj_ggtt_offset(obj));
-
I915_WRITE(ILK_DPFC_CONTROL, DPFC_CTL_EN | DPFC_CTL_LIMIT_1X |
IVB_DPFC_CTL_FENCE_EN |
intel_crtc->plane << IVB_DPFC_CTL_PLANE_SHIFT);
--
1.8.3.2
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list