[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/19] drm/i915: WARN if !HAS_PC8 when enabling/disabling PC8

[Rodrigo Vivi]

I think it should be a return instead a WARN.
Myabe I'm just sleeping yet, but I think the delayed work will execute this even for non HAS_PC8 and warn will always ring on non HSW.
But even if I'm sleeping, since it really touch hsw registers wouldn't be safer a return instead of a warn anyway?


On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 01:47:15PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>
> 
> We already have some checks and shouldn't be reaching these places on
> !HAS_PC8 platforms, but add a WARN,  just in case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index e85d838..5566de5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -6623,6 +6623,8 @@ void hsw_enable_pc8_work(struct work_struct *__work)
>  	struct drm_device *dev = dev_priv->dev;
>  	uint32_t val;
>  
> +	WARN_ON(!HAS_PC8(dev));
> +
>  	if (dev_priv->pc8.enabled)
>  		return;
>  
> @@ -6668,6 +6670,8 @@ static void __hsw_disable_package_c8(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	if (dev_priv->pc8.disable_count != 1)
>  		return;
>  
> +	WARN_ON(!HAS_PC8(dev));
> +
>  	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dev_priv->pc8.enable_work);
>  	if (!dev_priv->pc8.enabled)
>  		return;
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx