[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/19] drm/i915: get a runtime PM reference when the panel VDD is on

[Rodrigo Vivi]

On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Paulo Zanoni <przanoni at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2013/11/29 Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at gmail.com>:
>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 01:47:23PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
>>> From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>
>>>
>>> And put it when it's off. Otherwise, when you run pm_pc8 from
>>> intel-gpu-tools, and the delayed function that disables VDD runs,
>>> we'll get some messages saying we're touching registers while the HW
>>> is suspended.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 7 +++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>>> index 28fc070..9e9e3d6 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>>> @@ -1092,6 +1092,8 @@ void ironlake_edp_panel_vdd_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>>>       if (ironlake_edp_have_panel_vdd(intel_dp))
>>>               return;
>>>
>>> +     intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
>>> +
>>>       DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Turning eDP VDD on\n");
>>>
>>>       if (!ironlake_edp_have_panel_power(intel_dp))
>>> @@ -1141,6 +1143,8 @@ static void ironlake_panel_vdd_off_sync(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>>>               DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PP_STATUS: 0x%08x PP_CONTROL: 0x%08x\n",
>>>               I915_READ(pp_stat_reg), I915_READ(pp_ctrl_reg));
>>>               msleep(intel_dp->panel_power_down_delay);
>>> +
>>> +             intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
>>>       }
>>>  }
>>>
>>> @@ -1248,6 +1252,9 @@ void ironlake_edp_panel_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>>>       intel_dp->want_panel_vdd = false;
>>>
>>>       ironlake_wait_panel_off(intel_dp);
>>> +
>>> +     /* We got a reference when we enabled the VDD. */
>>> +     intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
>>
>> I was going to say it was missing a get until I read the comment above.
>> But if it gets on VDD on, why not just let it put back on VDD off instead?
>
> That's the goal of my series. See patches 15 and 16.

I saw both and got your point, but even after them get and put doesn't
look in a symmetric place for me.

wouldn't make sense on this patch remove both of _put here and add one
in vdd_off?
Even after your vdd fixes it would be symmetric.

>
>>
>>>  }
>>>
>>>  void ironlake_edp_backlight_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>>> --
>>> 1.8.3.1
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>>> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
>
>
> --
> Paulo Zanoni



-- 
Rodrigo Vivi
Blog: http://blog.vivi.eng.br