[Intel-gfx] drm-intel-collector - update

Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.vivi at gmail.com
Tue Oct 1 00:49:54 CEST 2013


This is another drm-intel-collector updated notice:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~vivijim/drm-intel/log/?h=drm-intel-collector

Here goes the update list in order for better reviewers assignment:

Patch     drm/i915: check that the i965g/gm 4G limit is really obeyed - Reviewer: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau at intel.com>
Patch     drm/i915: Add some missing steps to i915_driver_load error path - Reviewer:  Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net>
Patch     drm/i915: Asynchronously perform the set-base for a simple modeset - Reviewer:
Patch     drm/i915: Initialise min/max frequencies before updating RPS registers - Reviewer:
Patch     drm/i915: implement another plane WM workaround for HSW - Reviewer:

Overall Process:

drm-intel-collector - review request
 1. Daniel pushs drm-intel-testing (every 2 weeks)
 2. I rebase drm-intel-collector onto drm-intel-testing
 3. Add Reviewer: tag with voluntered reviewers. If you don't believe you should be assigned on a particular patch please don't get mad just tell you wont review or volunteer someone else.
 4. I resubmit remaining patches for review without picking any new (drm-intel-collector - review request)

drm-intel-collector - updated
 5. One week later I collect all simple (1-2) patches that wasn't yet reviewed and not queued by Daniel from one testing update until another.
 6. Request automated QA's PRTS automated i-g-t tests comparing drm-intel-testing x drm-intel-collector
 7. If tests are ok I send the update notification or the patches as a series to intel-gfx mailing list for better tracking and to be reviewed. (drm-intel-collector - updated)
 8. Let me know volunteers for review new patches and also let me know if I've picked any patch that I shouldn't.

There are some reasons that some patches can be left behind:
1. Your patch didn't applied cleanly and I couldn't easily solve the conflicts.
2. Kernel didn't compiled with your patch.
3. I simply missed it. If you believe this is the case please warn me.

Please help me to get these patches reviewed and queued by Daniel.

Also, please let me know if you have further ideas how to improve this process.

Thanks in advance,
Rodrigo.


Chris Wilson (3):
  drm/i915: Add some missing steps to i915_driver_load error path
  drm/i915: Asynchronously perform the set-base for a simple modeset
  drm/i915: Initialise min/max frequencies before updating RPS registers

Daniel Vetter (1):
  drm/i915: check that the i965g/gm 4G limit is really obeyed

Paulo Zanoni (1):
  drm/i915: implement another plane WM workaround for HSW

 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c  |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c      | 19 +++++++++++++++----
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c      |  3 +++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c    | 16 ++++++++--------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c      | 19 +++++--------------
 6 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

-- 
1.8.1.4




More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list