[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/16] drm/i915: Add intel_pipe_wm and prepare for watermark pre-compute

Paulo Zanoni przanoni at gmail.com
Thu Oct 10 23:43:55 CEST 2013


2013/10/9  <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>
> Introduce a new struct intel_pipe_wm which contains all the
> watermarks for a single pipe. Use it to unify the LP0 and LP1+
> watermark computations so that we can just iterate through the
> watermark levels neatly and call ilk_compute_wm_level() for each.
>
> Also add another tool ilk_wm_merge() that merges the LP1+ watermarks
> from all pipes. For that, embed one intel_pipe_wm inside intel_crtc that
> contains the currently valid watermarks for each pipe.
>
> This is mainly preparatory work for pre-computing the watermarks for
> each pipe and merging them at a later time. For now the merging still
> happens immediately.
>
> v2: Add some comments about level 0 DDB split and intel_wm_config
>     Add WARN_ON for level 0 being disabled
>     s/lp_wm/merged
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h |  12 +++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c  | 192 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  2 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index 71cfabd..3325b0b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -309,6 +309,12 @@ struct intel_crtc_config {
>         bool double_wide;
>  };
>
> +struct intel_pipe_wm {
> +       struct intel_wm_level wm[5];
> +       uint32_t linetime;
> +       bool fbc_wm_enabled;
> +};
> +
>  struct intel_crtc {
>         struct drm_crtc base;
>         enum pipe pipe;
> @@ -349,6 +355,12 @@ struct intel_crtc {
>         /* Access to these should be protected by dev_priv->irq_lock. */
>         bool cpu_fifo_underrun_disabled;
>         bool pch_fifo_underrun_disabled;
> +
> +       /* per-pipe watermark state */
> +       struct {
> +               /* watermarks currently being used  */
> +               struct intel_pipe_wm active;
> +       } wm;
>  };
>
>  struct intel_plane_wm_parameters {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 5e743ec..30b380c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -2458,53 +2458,6 @@ static void ilk_compute_wm_level(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>         result->enable = true;
>  }
>
> -static bool hsw_compute_lp_wm(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> -                             int level, const struct hsw_wm_maximums *max,
> -                             const struct hsw_pipe_wm_parameters *params,
> -                             struct intel_wm_level *result)
> -{
> -       enum pipe pipe;
> -       struct intel_wm_level res[3];
> -
> -       for (pipe = PIPE_A; pipe <= PIPE_C; pipe++)
> -               ilk_compute_wm_level(dev_priv, level, &params[pipe], &res[pipe]);
> -
> -       result->pri_val = max3(res[0].pri_val, res[1].pri_val, res[2].pri_val);
> -       result->spr_val = max3(res[0].spr_val, res[1].spr_val, res[2].spr_val);
> -       result->cur_val = max3(res[0].cur_val, res[1].cur_val, res[2].cur_val);
> -       result->fbc_val = max3(res[0].fbc_val, res[1].fbc_val, res[2].fbc_val);
> -       result->enable = true;
> -
> -       return ilk_check_wm(level, max, result);
> -}
> -
> -
> -static uint32_t hsw_compute_wm_pipe(struct drm_device *dev,
> -                                   const struct hsw_pipe_wm_parameters *params)
> -{
> -       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> -       struct intel_wm_config config = {
> -               .num_pipes_active = 1,
> -               .sprites_enabled = params->spr.enabled,
> -               .sprites_scaled = params->spr.scaled,
> -       };
> -       struct hsw_wm_maximums max;
> -       struct intel_wm_level res;
> -
> -       if (!params->active)
> -               return 0;
> -
> -       ilk_wm_max(dev, 0, &config, INTEL_DDB_PART_1_2, &max);
> -
> -       ilk_compute_wm_level(dev_priv, 0, params, &res);
> -
> -       ilk_check_wm(0, &max, &res);
> -
> -       return (res.pri_val << WM0_PIPE_PLANE_SHIFT) |
> -              (res.spr_val << WM0_PIPE_SPRITE_SHIFT) |
> -              res.cur_val;
> -}
> -
>  static uint32_t
>  hsw_compute_linetime_wm(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_crtc *crtc)
>  {
> @@ -2687,44 +2640,123 @@ static void hsw_compute_wm_parameters(struct drm_device *dev,
>                 *lp_max_5_6 = *lp_max_1_2;
>  }
>
> +/* Compute new watermarks for the pipe */
> +static bool intel_compute_pipe_wm(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> +                                 const struct hsw_pipe_wm_parameters *params,
> +                                 struct intel_pipe_wm *pipe_wm)
> +{
> +       struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev;
> +       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> +       int level, max_level = ilk_wm_max_level(dev);
> +       /* LP0 watermark maximums depend on this pipe alone */
> +       struct intel_wm_config config = {
> +               .num_pipes_active = 1,
> +               .sprites_enabled = params->spr.enabled,
> +               .sprites_scaled = params->spr.scaled,
> +       };
> +       struct hsw_wm_maximums max;
> +
> +       memset(pipe_wm, 0, sizeof(*pipe_wm));
> +
> +       /* LP0 watermarks always use 1/2 DDB partitioning */
> +       ilk_wm_max(dev, 0, &config, INTEL_DDB_PART_1_2, &max);
> +
> +       for (level = 0; level <= max_level; level++)
> +               ilk_compute_wm_level(dev_priv, level, params,
> +                                    &pipe_wm->wm[level]);
> +
> +       pipe_wm->linetime = hsw_compute_linetime_wm(dev, crtc);
> +
> +       /* At least LP0 must be valid */
> +       return ilk_check_wm(0, &max, &pipe_wm->wm[0]);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Merge the watermarks from all active pipes for a specific level.
> + */
> +static void ilk_merge_wm_level(struct drm_device *dev,
> +                              int level,
> +                              struct intel_wm_level *ret_wm)
> +{
> +       const struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc;
> +
> +       list_for_each_entry(intel_crtc, &dev->mode_config.crtc_list, base.head) {
> +               const struct intel_wm_level *wm =
> +                       &intel_crtc->wm.active.wm[level];
> +
> +               if (!wm->enable)
> +                       return;

Why exactly is this check here and what does it mean? Why not a
"break" nor a "continue"? Do we expect to ever return at this point?

It seems intel_compute_pipe_wm calls ilk_compute_wm_level which sets
"result->enable = true" for everything. Then only level 0 goes through
ilk_check_wm (which may turn result->enable to zero), but the level1+
watermarks (which are the ones used in the merge function) never get a
chance to set wm->enable to false. So the check would be useless.
Maybe I'm missing something?

With the questions above (answered || fixed || clarified || patched):

Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>

> +
> +               ret_wm->pri_val = max(ret_wm->pri_val, wm->pri_val);
> +               ret_wm->spr_val = max(ret_wm->spr_val, wm->spr_val);
> +               ret_wm->cur_val = max(ret_wm->cur_val, wm->cur_val);
> +               ret_wm->fbc_val = max(ret_wm->fbc_val, wm->fbc_val);
> +       }
> +
> +       ret_wm->enable = true;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Merge all low power watermarks for all active pipes.
> + */
> +static void ilk_wm_merge(struct drm_device *dev,
> +                        const struct hsw_wm_maximums *max,
> +                        struct intel_pipe_wm *merged)
> +{
> +       int level, max_level = ilk_wm_max_level(dev);
> +
> +       merged->fbc_wm_enabled = true;
> +
> +       /* merge each WM1+ level */
> +       for (level = 1; level <= max_level; level++) {
> +               struct intel_wm_level *wm = &merged->wm[level];
> +
> +               ilk_merge_wm_level(dev, level, wm);
> +
> +               if (!ilk_check_wm(level, max, wm))
> +                       break;
> +
> +               /*
> +                * The spec says it is preferred to disable
> +                * FBC WMs instead of disabling a WM level.
> +                */
> +               if (wm->fbc_val > max->fbc) {
> +                       merged->fbc_wm_enabled = false;
> +                       wm->fbc_val = 0;
> +               }
> +       }
> +}
> +
>  static void hsw_compute_wm_results(struct drm_device *dev,
>                                    const struct hsw_pipe_wm_parameters *params,
>                                    const struct hsw_wm_maximums *lp_maximums,
>                                    struct hsw_wm_values *results)
>  {
> -       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> -       struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> -       struct intel_wm_level lp_results[4] = {};
> -       enum pipe pipe;
> -       int level, max_level, wm_lp;
> +       struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc;
> +       int level, wm_lp;
> +       struct intel_pipe_wm merged = {};
>
> -       for (level = 1; level <= 4; level++)
> -               if (!hsw_compute_lp_wm(dev_priv, level,
> -                                      lp_maximums, params,
> -                                      &lp_results[level - 1]))
> -                       break;
> -       max_level = level - 1;
> +       list_for_each_entry(intel_crtc, &dev->mode_config.crtc_list, base.head)
> +               intel_compute_pipe_wm(&intel_crtc->base,
> +                                     &params[intel_crtc->pipe],
> +                                     &intel_crtc->wm.active);
> +
> +       ilk_wm_merge(dev, lp_maximums, &merged);
>
>         memset(results, 0, sizeof(*results));
>
> -       /* The spec says it is preferred to disable FBC WMs instead of disabling
> -        * a WM level. */
> -       results->enable_fbc_wm = true;
> -       for (level = 1; level <= max_level; level++) {
> -               if (lp_results[level - 1].fbc_val > lp_maximums->fbc) {
> -                       results->enable_fbc_wm = false;
> -                       lp_results[level - 1].fbc_val = 0;
> -               }
> -       }
> +       results->enable_fbc_wm = merged.fbc_wm_enabled;
>
> +       /* LP1+ register values */
>         for (wm_lp = 1; wm_lp <= 3; wm_lp++) {
>                 const struct intel_wm_level *r;
>
> -               level = (max_level == 4 && wm_lp > 1) ? wm_lp + 1 : wm_lp;
> -               if (level > max_level)
> +               level = wm_lp + (wm_lp >= 2 && merged.wm[4].enable);
> +
> +               r = &merged.wm[level];
> +               if (!r->enable)
>                         break;
>
> -               r = &lp_results[level - 1];
>                 results->wm_lp[wm_lp - 1] = HSW_WM_LP_VAL(level * 2,
>                                                           r->fbc_val,
>                                                           r->pri_val,
> @@ -2732,13 +2764,21 @@ static void hsw_compute_wm_results(struct drm_device *dev,
>                 results->wm_lp_spr[wm_lp - 1] = r->spr_val;
>         }
>
> -       for_each_pipe(pipe)
> -               results->wm_pipe[pipe] = hsw_compute_wm_pipe(dev,
> -                                                            &params[pipe]);
> +       /* LP0 register values */
> +       list_for_each_entry(intel_crtc, &dev->mode_config.crtc_list, base.head) {
> +               enum pipe pipe = intel_crtc->pipe;
> +               const struct intel_wm_level *r =
> +                       &intel_crtc->wm.active.wm[0];
>
> -       for_each_pipe(pipe) {
> -               crtc = dev_priv->pipe_to_crtc_mapping[pipe];
> -               results->wm_linetime[pipe] = hsw_compute_linetime_wm(dev, crtc);
> +               if (WARN_ON(!r->enable))
> +                       continue;
> +
> +               results->wm_linetime[pipe] = intel_crtc->wm.active.linetime;
> +
> +               results->wm_pipe[pipe] =
> +                       (r->pri_val << WM0_PIPE_PLANE_SHIFT) |
> +                       (r->spr_val << WM0_PIPE_SPRITE_SHIFT) |
> +                       r->cur_val;
>         }
>  }
>
> --
> 1.8.1.5
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx



-- 
Paulo Zanoni



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list