[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915: adjusted_mode.clock vs. port_clock vs. pixel_multiplier
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Tue Sep 3 15:21:02 CEST 2013
As I mentioned before, I'd like adjusted_mode.clock to be the pipe pixel clock.
So to me it looks like all we need to do to store the pixel multiplied
clock into port_clock, and then adjusted_mode.clock can stay as the
non-multiplied pixel clock.
Seems simple enough. But a big warning here, I didn't test this at all yet.
Also I don't have any SDVO hardware to make sure I didn't fumble something
on that side.
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list