[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Do not unlock upon error in i915_gem_idle()
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Sat Sep 14 00:57:04 CEST 2013
We never took the lock ourselves and all callers expect the struct_mutex
to be locked upon return (be it success or error), thereore dropping the
lock along the error paths looks to be a vestigial error from
commit db1b76ca6a79c774074ae87bee7afc0825a478f5
Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
Date: Tue Jul 9 16:51:37 2013 +0200
drm/i915: don't frob mm.suspended when not using ums
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 9 +++------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index cd71b71..81407a6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -4415,16 +4415,13 @@ i915_gem_idle(struct drm_device *dev)
drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
int ret;
- if (dev_priv->ums.mm_suspended) {
- mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+ if (dev_priv->ums.mm_suspended)
return 0;
- }
ret = i915_gpu_idle(dev);
- if (ret) {
- mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+ if (ret)
return ret;
- }
+
i915_gem_retire_requests(dev);
/* Under UMS, be paranoid and evict. */
--
1.7.9.5
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list