[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Do not unlock upon error in i915_gem_idle()

Chris Wilson chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Sat Sep 14 00:57:04 CEST 2013


We never took the lock ourselves and all callers expect the struct_mutex
to be locked upon return (be it success or error), thereore dropping the
lock along the error paths looks to be a vestigial error from

commit db1b76ca6a79c774074ae87bee7afc0825a478f5
Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
Date:   Tue Jul 9 16:51:37 2013 +0200

    drm/i915: don't frob mm.suspended when not using ums

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c |    9 +++------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index cd71b71..81407a6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -4415,16 +4415,13 @@ i915_gem_idle(struct drm_device *dev)
 	drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (dev_priv->ums.mm_suspended) {
-		mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+	if (dev_priv->ums.mm_suspended)
 		return 0;
-	}
 
 	ret = i915_gpu_idle(dev);
-	if (ret) {
-		mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+	if (ret)
 		return ret;
-	}
+
 	i915_gem_retire_requests(dev);
 
 	/* Under UMS, be paranoid and evict. */
-- 
1.7.9.5




More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list