[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] gtt patches

[Ben Widawsky]

On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:31:26PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> So the first part reworks the gtt ->bind/unbind stuff so that I can rebase the
> -internal try without going berserk. 2nd patch is a bit of fluff removal, next
> for do reorder i915_gem_gtt.c a bit to make more sense (I've been confused every
> 2nd time I've had to rebase -internal and there was a conflict in there, call me
> stupid ...). Last one is my ducttape for the BUG_ON Ville hit.
> 
> Cheers, Daniel
> 
> Daniel Vetter (7):
>   drm/i915: resurrect ->insert_entries/->clear_range gtt interfaces
>   drm/i915: don't allow ppgtt enabling to fail anymore
>   drm/i915/gtt: group sg setup/teardown functions to the end
>   drm/i915/gtt: move restore_gtt_mappings to the bottom
>   drm/i915/gtt: group legacy global gtt code together
>   drm/i915/gtt: move generic setup code all to the bottom
>   drm/i915: we can't call move_to_active before intel_ring_begin
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c            |   4 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c            |   4 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h            |   6 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c            |   8 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c |  40 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c        | 683 ++++++++++++++---------------
>  6 files changed, 357 insertions(+), 388 deletions(-)
> 

At this point it just seems like you're intentionally making it harder
for me to ever merge PPGTT.

-- 
Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center