[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Rebalance runtime pm vs forcewake

[Daniel Vetter]

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 09:32:50AM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
>> 2014-04-01 5:14 GMT-03:00 Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>:
>> > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 08:59:29PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> >> On that topic, qa has finally found the drv_suspend/forcewake issue. Chris
>> >> can you please pick out the minimal fix for that out of your tree? Maybe
>> >> on top of Paulo's fixes so that I don't have to wreak the patch applying
>> >> ;-)
>> >
>> > To be clear, are these the fixes in the tree already, or should I pull
>> > in another branch first? Paulo?
>>
>> I think he wanted you to base your patches on top of just this
>> specific commit:
>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~pzanoni/linux/commit/?h=bdw-runtime-pm-2014-03-28&id=a4f3ebda1df2a0f24a7d480f67b153df8fc0c9f0
>
> But the whole point of the rebalancing fix was to avoid having to apply
> that patch?

Management put down the hammer and told me that "runtime pm for bdw
must go in _now_". So it's going to be this one apparently.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch