[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/6] drm-intel-collector - update

[Rodrigo Vivi]

This is another drm-intel-collector updated notice:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~vivijim/drm-intel/log/?h=drm-intel-collector

Here goes the update list in order for better reviewers assignment:

Patch     drm/i915: Bring UP Power Wells before disabling RC6. - Reviewer:
Patch     drm/i915: dma_buf_vunmap is presumed not to fail, don't let it - Reviewer:
Patch     drm/i915: Add support for stealing purgable stolen pages - Reviewer:
Patch     drm/i915: add flag to prevent dmesg spam on context banning - Reviewer:
Patch     drm/i915: Do not allow a pending forcewake put to unbalance across reset - Reviewer:
Patch     drm/i915: Don't save/restore RS when not used - Reviewer:

Overall Process:

drm-intel-collector - review request
 1. Daniel pushs drm-intel-testing (every 2 weeks)
 2. I rebase drm-intel-collector onto drm-intel-testing
 3. Add Reviewer: tag with voluntered reviewers. If you don't believe you should be assigned on a particular patch please don't get mad just tell you wont review or volunteer someone else.
 4. I resubmit remaining patches for review without picking any new (drm-intel-collector - review request)

drm-intel-collector - updated
 5. One week later I collect all simple (1-2) patches that wasn't yet reviewed and not queued by Daniel from one testing update until another.
 6. Request automated QA's PRTS automated i-g-t tests comparing drm-intel-testing x drm-intel-collector
 7. If tests are ok I send the update notification or the patches as a series to intel-gfx mailing list for better tracking and to be reviewed. (drm-intel-collector - updated)
 8. Let me know volunteers for review new patches and also let me know if I've picked any patch that I shouldn't.

There are some reasons that some patches can be left behind:
1. Your patch didn't applied cleanly and I couldn't easily solve the conflicts.
2. Kernel didn't compiled with your patch.
3. I simply missed it. If you believe this is the case please warn me.

Please help me to get these patches reviewed and queued by Daniel.

Also, please let me know if you have further ideas how to improve this process.

Thanks in advance,
Rodrigo.


Ben Widawsky (1):
  drm/i915: Don't save/restore RS when not used

Chris Wilson (3):
  drm/i915: dma_buf_vunmap is presumed not to fail, don't let it
  drm/i915: Add support for stealing purgable stolen pages
  drm/i915: Do not allow a pending forcewake put to unbalance across
    reset

Deepak S (1):
  drm/i915: Bring UP Power Wells before disabling RC6.

Mika Kuoppala (1):
  drm/i915: add flag to prevent dmesg spam on context banning

 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h         |  18 ++++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c         |   5 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c |  12 ++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_dmabuf.c  |   6 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c  | 119 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c         |   6 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c |   2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c     |   5 +-
 8 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

-- 
1.9.0