[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Bring UP Power Wells before disabling RC6.

Ben Widawsky ben at bwidawsk.net
Mon Apr 7 23:36:20 CEST 2014


On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 05:01:46PM -0300, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> From: Deepak S <deepak.s at intel.com>
> 
> We need do forcewake before Disabling RC6, This is what the BIOS
> expects while going into suspend.
> 
> v2: updated commit message. (Daniel)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Deepak S <deepak.s at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 04af065..ad2ff99 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -3198,8 +3198,14 @@ static void valleyview_disable_rps(struct drm_device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>  
> +	/* we're doing forcewake before Disabling RC6,
> +	 * This what the BIOS expects when going into suspend */
> +	gen6_gt_force_wake_get(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
> +
>  	I915_WRITE(GEN6_RC_CONTROL, 0);
>  
> +	gen6_gt_force_wake_put(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
> +
>  	gen6_disable_rps_interrupts(dev);
>  }
>  

Isn't the forcewake done as part of I915_WRITE sufficient?

-- 
Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list