[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/mm: Don't WARN if drm_mm_reserve_node

Chris Wilson chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Wed Apr 9 08:25:37 CEST 2014


On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 10:21:44AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> I am not convinced this is the correct solution. At least the way we
> used this interface, it isn't meant to ever fail.  I also didn't look
> into exactly why we depend an ENOSPC return. That sounds fragile to me,
> especially for a public interface.

Eh? This interface is explicitly used to check that the requested range
is available.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list