[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Prevent signals from interrupting close()

[Chris Wilson]

On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 10:43:47AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 08:03:39AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > We neither report any unfinished operations during releasing GEM objects
> > associated with the file, and even if we did, it is bad form to report
> > -EINTR from a close().
> > 
> > The root cause of the bug that first showed itself during close is that
> > we do not do proper live tracking of vma and contexts under full-ppgtt,
> > but this is useful piece of defensive programming enforcing our
> > userspace API contract.
> > 
> > Cc: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c | 9 +++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
> > index 24dd55a16436..d67ca8051e07 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
> > @@ -1937,9 +1937,18 @@ void i915_driver_lastclose(struct drm_device * dev)
> >  
> >  void i915_driver_preclose(struct drm_device * dev, struct drm_file *file_priv)
> >  {
> > +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> > +	bool was_interruptible;
> > +
> >  	mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> > +	was_interruptible = dev_priv->mm.interruptible;
> > +	WARN_ON(!was_interruptible);
> > +	dev_priv->mm.interruptible = false;
> > +
> >  	i915_gem_context_close(dev, file_priv);
> >  	i915_gem_release(dev, file_priv);
> > +
> > +	dev_priv->mm.interruptible = was_interruptible;
> >  	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> >  }
> >  
> 
> I guess you missed:
> 1396905423-19453-1-git-send-email-benjamin.widawsky at intel.com

Oops, I did.
 
> True in my case, I should have put the read of
> 'dev_priv->mm.interruptible' within the lock.
> 
> I don't think we need to protect gem_release.

My argument is that I want to protect the entire preclose() as it cannot
be allowed to fail, i.e. all future bugs.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre