[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/71] drm/i915/chv: Add Cherryview support

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 09:31:39AM +0530, S, Deepak wrote:
> 
> 
> On 4/10/2014 1:30 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:42:42AM +0530, S, Deepak wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 4/9/2014 10:23 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 06:05:27PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> >>>> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 02:30:52PM +0000, S, Deepak wrote:
> >>>>> Hi Ville,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I am Ok with  cleaning up and pushing the Code. Can you please tell me
> >>>>> when we need to start pushing the code and branch to use
> >>>>> (drm-intel-next)?
> >>>>
> >>>> Well you can consider it pushed now that it's in the open. The patches
> >>>> just need a bit of extra polish I think. Well, unless you're planning
> >>>> a full blown rewrite of the code ;)
> >>>>
> >>>> I guess you need to take into consideration whatever bdw rc6/rps patches
> >>>> are still in flight, but since you've been doing some review there I
> >>>> think you have a better idea than I do how things are progressing.
> >>>>
> >>>> I always work on top of nightly, so I guess that's a good choice :)
> >>>
> >>> Yes, -nightly is always the recommended branch to base upstream patches
> >>> on. I'll sort out the conflict mess (or well, try to) if it doesn't apply
> >>> to plain dinq or some other branch. drm-intel-next tends to be too
> >>> outdated ;-)
> >>> -Daniel
> >>
> >> Hi Daniel/Ville.
> >>
> >> Some of the patches are lined up for squashing right? So you want me
> >> to work on this patches to align to upstream code and resubmit it to
> >> same email thread?
> >
> > Hm, I expect this chv thread to become a bit mess really quickly tbh ;-)
> > And since we don't have chv merged yet there's not really a baseline to do
> > this on top.
> >
> > I guess the simplest approach would be for you to grab ville's chv tree,
> > squash in the patches as discussed and then just starting on polishing
> > your chv patches. Then as I pull in patches from this series you can drop
> > them from yours. A bit messy, but I don't see any other approach really.
> >
> > Note that a pile of people are signed up to review this, so maybe hold off
> > a bit until the review for your patches have been done.
> > -Daniel
> 
> Thanks Daniel.
> Ville can you please share your chv tree details?

I rebased the lot and pushed here:
git://gitorious.org/vsyrjala/linux.git chv_rebase

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC