[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915: Add parsing support for new MIPI blocks in VBT
Kumar, Shobhit
shobhit.kumar at intel.com
Mon Apr 14 11:55:22 CEST 2014
On 4/14/2014 2:35 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 01:24:43PM +0530, Kumar, Shobhit wrote:
>> On 4/14/2014 12:32 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:00:34AM +0530, Shobhit Kumar wrote:
>>>> The parser extracts the config block(#52) and sequence(#53) data
>>>> and store in private data structures.
>>>>
>>>> v2: Address review comments by Jani
>>>> - adjust code for the structure changes for bdb_mipi_config
>>>> - add boundry and buffer overflow checks as suggested
>>>> - use kmemdup instead of kmalloc and memcpy
>>>>
>>>> v3: More strict check while parsing VBT
>>>> - Ensure that at anytime we do not go beyond sequence block
>>>> while parsing
>>>> - On unknown element fail the whole parsing
>>>>
>>>> v4: Style changes and spell check mostly as suggested by Jani
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar at intel.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
>>>
>>> I didn't spot Jani's r-b tag in earlier mails, was that done off-list?
>>
>> Yeah, was reviewed along with the other DSI patchset you merged, sorry about
>> that. But then some patches needed internal review while they were being
>> approved for up-streaming to save time. And this one was related to the
>> other panel driver patches which I published today so got stuck with them.
>> Sorry about that.
>
> Ok, pulled it in. checkpatch complained a few times about assignments in
> if conditions, and I tend to agree. Can you please follow up with a
> cleanup patch? Also it looks like assignment operators could be used.
> -Daniel
Ok. Thanks. I should have run checkpatch. Will fix and push a cleanup patch.
Regards
Shobhit
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list