[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/71] drm/i915/chv: Add Cherryview support

[S, Deepak]

On 4/15/2014 9:46 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 09:19:27PM +0530, S, Deepak wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 4/10/2014 7:34 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 04:41:10PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 10 Apr 2014, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 09:31:39AM +0530, S, Deepak wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/10/2014 1:30 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:42:42AM +0530, S, Deepak wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 4/9/2014 10:23 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 06:05:27PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 02:30:52PM +0000, S, Deepak wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Ville,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I am Ok with  cleaning up and pushing the Code. Can you please tell me
>>>>>>>>>>> when we need to start pushing the code and branch to use
>>>>>>>>>>> (drm-intel-next)?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Well you can consider it pushed now that it's in the open. The patches
>>>>>>>>>> just need a bit of extra polish I think. Well, unless you're planning
>>>>>>>>>> a full blown rewrite of the code ;)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I guess you need to take into consideration whatever bdw rc6/rps patches
>>>>>>>>>> are still in flight, but since you've been doing some review there I
>>>>>>>>>> think you have a better idea than I do how things are progressing.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I always work on top of nightly, so I guess that's a good choice :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes, -nightly is always the recommended branch to base upstream patches
>>>>>>>>> on. I'll sort out the conflict mess (or well, try to) if it doesn't apply
>>>>>>>>> to plain dinq or some other branch. drm-intel-next tends to be too
>>>>>>>>> outdated ;-)
>>>>>>>>> -Daniel
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Daniel/Ville.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Some of the patches are lined up for squashing right? So you want me
>>>>>>>> to work on this patches to align to upstream code and resubmit it to
>>>>>>>> same email thread?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hm, I expect this chv thread to become a bit mess really quickly tbh ;-)
>>>>>>> And since we don't have chv merged yet there's not really a baseline to do
>>>>>>> this on top.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I guess the simplest approach would be for you to grab ville's chv tree,
>>>>>>> squash in the patches as discussed and then just starting on polishing
>>>>>>> your chv patches. Then as I pull in patches from this series you can drop
>>>>>>> them from yours. A bit messy, but I don't see any other approach really.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Note that a pile of people are signed up to review this, so maybe hold off
>>>>>>> a bit until the review for your patches have been done.
>>>>>>> -Daniel
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks Daniel.
>>>>>> Ville can you please share your chv tree details?
>>>>>
>>>>> I rebased the lot and pushed here:
>>>>> git://gitorious.org/vsyrjala/linux.git chv_rebase
>>>>
>>>> /me being lazy, did you squash/reorder patches, i.e. do the patch #
>>>> assignments [1] for review still apply?
>>>
>>> The numbers would get shifted around a bit due to two these two patches
>>> already getting merged:
>>>    drm/i915/chv: IS_BROADWELL() should not be true for Cherryview
>>>    drm/i915/chv: Add IS_CHERRYVIEW() macro
>>>
>>> And this patch got dropped as it no longer applies:
>>>    drm/i915/chv: Add plane C support
>>>
>>> Apart from that no reordering/squashing.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jani.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://mid.gmane.org/20140410110857.GW18465@intel.com
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Ville Syrjälä
>>>>> Intel OTC
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>>>>> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>>>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
>>
>> Hi Ville,
>>
>> Have you already squashed some of the RC6/turbo patches? Or you want me
>> to do it as part of RC6/RPS rework patches submission.
>
> No, I didn't do it. If you can take care of it that'd be great.
Ok, I will take care of squashing the patch. I will submit all rc6/rps 
patches after cleanup.