[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915: get a runtime PM ref for the deferred GPU reset work
Daniel Vetter
daniel at ffwll.ch
Tue Apr 22 21:38:00 CEST 2014
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 03:47:45PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> Atm we can end up in the GPU reset deferred work in D3 state if the last
> runtime PM reference is dropped between detecting a hang/scheduling the
> work and executing the work. At least one such case I could trigger is
> the simulated reset via the i915_wedged debugfs entry. Fix this by
> disabling RPM before scheduling the work until the end of the work.
>
> v2:
> - Instead of getting/putting the RPM reference in the reset work itself,
> get it already before scheduling the work. By this we also prevent
> going to D3 before the work gets to run, in addition to making sure
> that we run the work itself in D0. (Ville, Daniel)
> v3:
> - fix inverted logic fail when putting the RPM ref on behalf of a
> cancelled GPU reset work (Ville)
>
> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c | 8 +++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
> index 0b38f88..f792576 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
> @@ -1823,7 +1823,13 @@ int i915_driver_unload(struct drm_device *dev)
>
> /* Free error state after interrupts are fully disabled. */
> del_timer_sync(&dev_priv->gpu_error.hangcheck_timer);
> - cancel_work_sync(&dev_priv->gpu_error.work);
> + if (cancel_work_sync(&dev_priv->gpu_error.work))
> + /*
> + * The following won't make any difference in the PM state,
> + * since RPM is disabled already, but do it still for
> + * consistency.
> + */
> + intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
> i915_destroy_error_state(dev);
>
> if (dev->pdev->msi_enabled)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> index a651d0d..5e079d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@ -2210,6 +2210,9 @@ static void i915_error_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
> */
> i915_error_wake_up(dev_priv, true);
> }
> +
> + /* Drop the ref we took when scheduling this work. */
> + intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
> }
>
> static void i915_report_and_clear_eir(struct drm_device *dev)
> @@ -2353,8 +2356,24 @@ void i915_handle_error(struct drm_device *dev, bool wedged,
> * state of outstanding pagelips). Hence it must not be run on our own
> * dev-priv->wq work queue for otherwise the flush_work in the pageflip
> * code will deadlock.
> + *
> + * It's guaranteed that here we are in D0 state, since we can only get
> + * here via one of the following paths:
> + * - From an IRQ handler's error detection. -> The driver must make
> + * sure that IRQs are unmasked only while holding an RPM ref.
> + * - From hang-check due to a blocked request. -> The request holds an
> + * RPM ref, that's only released in i915_gpu_idle() which in turn
> + * won't be called until the request is finished.
> + * - From hang-check due to a flip hang. -> We have an RPM ref because
> + * of the active modeset.
> + * - From debugfs i915_wedged_set(). -> The caller takes an explicit
> + * RPM ref.
> + * Take here an atomic RPM ref still to make sure that we don't
> + * re-enter D3 until the error work gets to run and completes the
> + * reset.
> */
> - schedule_work(&dev_priv->gpu_error.work);
> + if (schedule_work(&dev_priv->gpu_error.work))
> + intel_runtime_pm_get_noresume(dev_priv);
Isn't this a bit racy? A 2nd gpu could immediately execute the work while
this one here gets interrupted by NMI ...
I think we need to grab the ref earlier before the schedule_work. Or we
just grab it in the reset work around the register access. Actually I
think this is the right fix since we can only hit this cause by
fake-injecting a hang through debugfs. For real hangs we'll be holding a
runtime pm ref until the last request is completed by the gpu, which won't
happen if the gpu is hung.
Doing the get/put in the worker only also avoids the need to do a get from
atomic context, which is fairly fragile.
We should have a comment in the reset work explaining why we need it
though.
-Daniel
> }
>
> static void __always_unused i915_pageflip_stall_check(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe)
> --
> 1.8.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list