[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Catch abuse of I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_*

[Daniel Vetter]

A bit tricky since 0 is also a valid constant ...

v2: Add DRM_DEBUG (Chris)

Testcase: igt/gem_exec_params/rel-constants-*
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
index 04102cc80ef4..c7ef65c3ae91 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
@@ -1060,14 +1060,22 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
 	case I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_REL_GENERAL:
 	case I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_ABSOLUTE:
 	case I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_REL_SURFACE:
-		if (ring == &dev_priv->ring[RCS] &&
-		    mode != dev_priv->relative_constants_mode) {
-			if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 4)
+		if (mode != 0 && ring != &dev_priv->ring[RCS]) {
+			DRM_DEBUG("non-0 rel constants mode on non-RCS\n");
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+
+		if (mode != dev_priv->relative_constants_mode) {
+			if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 4) {
+				DRM_DEBUG("no rel constants on pre-gen4\n");
 				return -EINVAL;
+			}
 
 			if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen > 5 &&
-			    mode == I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_REL_SURFACE)
+			    mode == I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_REL_SURFACE) {
+				DRM_DEBUG("rel surface constants mode invalid on gen5+\n");
 				return -EINVAL;
+			}
 
 			/* The HW changed the meaning on this bit on gen6 */
 			if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 6)
-- 
1.8.1.4