[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 34/43] drm/i915/bdw: Make sure gpu reset still works with Execlists

Daniel, Thomas thomas.daniel at intel.com
Wed Aug 6 11:26:19 CEST 2014


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lespiau, Damien
> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2014 3:42 PM
> To: Daniel, Thomas
> Cc: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 34/43] drm/i915/bdw: Make sure gpu reset
> still works with Execlists
> 
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 05:04:42PM +0100, Thomas Daniel wrote:
> > From: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo at intel.com>
> >
> > If we reset a ring after a hang, we have to make sure that we clear
> > out all queued Execlists requests.
> >
> > v2: The ring is, at this point, already being correctly re-programmed
> > for Execlists, and the hangcheck counters cleared.
> >
> > v3: Daniel suggests to drop the "if (execlists)" because the Execlists
> > queue should be empty in legacy mode (which is true, if we do the
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD).
> >
> > v4: Do the pending intel_runtime_pm_put
> 
> I don't see a intel_runtime_pm_get() that put() would correspond to.
It is in execlists_context_queue() where the request is added to the queue.

> 
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c         |   12 ++++++++++++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c |    1 +
> >  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c index 1c83b9c..143cff7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> > @@ -2567,6 +2567,18 @@ static void i915_gem_reset_ring_cleanup(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  		i915_gem_free_request(request);
> >  	}
> >
> > +	while (!list_empty(&ring->execlist_queue)) {
> > +		struct intel_ctx_submit_request *submit_req;
> > +
> > +		submit_req = list_first_entry(&ring->execlist_queue,
> > +				struct intel_ctx_submit_request,
> > +				execlist_link);
> > +		list_del(&submit_req->execlist_link);
> > +		intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
> > +		i915_gem_context_unreference(submit_req->ctx);
> > +		kfree(submit_req);
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	/* These may not have been flush before the reset, do so now */
> >  	kfree(ring->preallocated_lazy_request);
> >  	ring->preallocated_lazy_request = NULL; diff --git
> > a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> > index 3188403..6e604c9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> > @@ -1587,6 +1587,7 @@ static int intel_init_ring_buffer(struct drm_device
> *dev,
> >  	ring->dev = dev;
> >  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ring->active_list);
> >  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ring->request_list);
> > +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ring->execlist_queue);
> >  	ringbuf->size = 32 * PAGE_SIZE;
> >  	ringbuf->ring = ring;
> >  	ringbuf->ctx = ring->default_context;
> > --
> > 1.7.9.5
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list