[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: No busy-loop wait_for in the ring init code

Chris Wilson chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Thu Aug 7 16:12:37 CEST 2014


On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 04:07:59PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Doing a 1s wait (tops) with the cpu is a bit excessive. Tune it down
> like everything else in that code.

1s? Didn't wait_for_atomic() take a timeout in microseconds?
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list