[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/43] drm/i915/bdw: Workload submission mechanism for Execlists
Daniel Vetter
daniel at ffwll.ch
Mon Aug 11 22:30:55 CEST 2014
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 05:04:33PM +0100, Thomas Daniel wrote:
> From: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo at intel.com>
>
> This is what i915_gem_do_execbuffer calls when it wants to execute some
> worload in an Execlists world.
>
> v2: Check arguments before doing stuff in intel_execlists_submission. Also,
> get rel_constants parsing right.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 6 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 4 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 1caed52..4303e2c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -2239,6 +2239,12 @@ int i915_gem_set_domain_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> struct drm_file *file_priv);
> int i915_gem_sw_finish_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> struct drm_file *file_priv);
> +void i915_gem_execbuffer_move_to_active(struct list_head *vmas,
> + struct intel_engine_cs *ring);
> +void i915_gem_execbuffer_retire_commands(struct drm_device *dev,
> + struct drm_file *file,
> + struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
> + struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj);
> int i915_gem_ringbuffer_submission(struct drm_device *dev,
> struct drm_file *file,
> struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> index 8c63d79..cae7df8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> @@ -962,7 +962,7 @@ i915_gem_validate_context(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file,
> return ctx;
> }
>
> -static void
> +void
> i915_gem_execbuffer_move_to_active(struct list_head *vmas,
> struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
> {
> @@ -994,7 +994,7 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer_move_to_active(struct list_head *vmas,
> }
> }
>
> -static void
> +void
> i915_gem_execbuffer_retire_commands(struct drm_device *dev,
> struct drm_file *file,
> struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> index 55ee8dd..cd834b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -89,6 +89,57 @@ int intel_sanitize_enable_execlists(struct drm_device *dev, int enable_execlists
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int logical_ring_invalidate_all_caches(struct intel_ringbuffer *ringbuf)
> +{
> + struct intel_engine_cs *ring = ringbuf->ring;
> + uint32_t flush_domains;
> + int ret;
> +
> + flush_domains = 0;
> + if (ring->gpu_caches_dirty)
> + flush_domains = I915_GEM_GPU_DOMAINS;
> +
> + ret = ring->emit_flush(ringbuf, I915_GEM_GPU_DOMAINS, flush_domains);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ring->gpu_caches_dirty = false;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int execlists_move_to_gpu(struct intel_ringbuffer *ringbuf,
> + struct list_head *vmas)
> +{
> + struct intel_engine_cs *ring = ringbuf->ring;
> + struct i915_vma *vma;
> + uint32_t flush_domains = 0;
> + bool flush_chipset = false;
> + int ret;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(vma, vmas, exec_list) {
> + struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = vma->obj;
> + ret = i915_gem_object_sync(obj, ring);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (obj->base.write_domain & I915_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU)
> + flush_chipset |= i915_gem_clflush_object(obj, false);
> +
> + flush_domains |= obj->base.write_domain;
> + }
> +
> + if (flush_chipset)
> + i915_gem_chipset_flush(ring->dev);
chipset flush is gen5 and earlier only. I'll ditch it.
> +
> + if (flush_domains & I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT)
> + wmb();
> +
> + /* Unconditionally invalidate gpu caches and ensure that we do flush
> + * any residual writes from the previous batch.
> + */
> + return logical_ring_invalidate_all_caches(ringbuf);
> +}
> +
> int intel_execlists_submission(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file,
> struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
> struct intel_context *ctx,
> @@ -97,7 +148,84 @@ int intel_execlists_submission(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file,
> struct drm_i915_gem_object *batch_obj,
> u64 exec_start, u32 flags)
> {
> - /* TODO */
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> + struct intel_ringbuffer *ringbuf = ctx->engine[ring->id].ringbuf;
> + int instp_mode;
> + u32 instp_mask;
> + int ret;
> +
> + instp_mode = args->flags & I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_MASK;
> + instp_mask = I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_MASK;
> + switch (instp_mode) {
> + case I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_REL_GENERAL:
> + case I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_ABSOLUTE:
> + case I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_REL_SURFACE:
> + if (instp_mode != 0 && ring != &dev_priv->ring[RCS]) {
> + DRM_DEBUG("non-0 rel constants mode on non-RCS\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (instp_mode != dev_priv->relative_constants_mode) {
> + if (instp_mode == I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_REL_SURFACE) {
> + DRM_DEBUG("rel surface constants mode invalid on gen5+\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /* The HW changed the meaning on this bit on gen6 */
> + instp_mask &= ~I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_REL_SURFACE;
> + }
> + break;
> + default:
> + DRM_DEBUG("execbuf with unknown constants: %d\n", instp_mode);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (args->num_cliprects != 0) {
> + DRM_DEBUG("clip rectangles are only valid on pre-gen5\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + } else {
> + if (args->DR4 == 0xffffffff) {
> + DRM_DEBUG("UXA submitting garbage DR4, fixing up\n");
> + args->DR4 = 0;
> + }
> +
> + if (args->DR1 || args->DR4 || args->cliprects_ptr) {
> + DRM_DEBUG("0 cliprects but dirt in cliprects fields\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + }
Yay for all the legacy nonsense that we can ditch here ;-)
-Daniel
> +
> + if (args->flags & I915_EXEC_GEN7_SOL_RESET) {
> + DRM_DEBUG("sol reset is gen7 only\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + ret = execlists_move_to_gpu(ringbuf, vmas);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (ring == &dev_priv->ring[RCS] &&
> + instp_mode != dev_priv->relative_constants_mode) {
> + ret = intel_logical_ring_begin(ringbuf, 4);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, MI_NOOP);
> + intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM(1));
> + intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, INSTPM);
> + intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, instp_mask << 16 | instp_mode);
> + intel_logical_ring_advance(ringbuf);
> +
> + dev_priv->relative_constants_mode = instp_mode;
> + }
> +
> + ret = ring->emit_bb_start(ringbuf, exec_start, flags);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + i915_gem_execbuffer_move_to_active(vmas, ring);
> + i915_gem_execbuffer_retire_commands(dev, file, ring, batch_obj);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list