[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: fix plane/cursor handling when runtime suspended

Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Mon Aug 18 16:35:06 CEST 2014


On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 03:59:32PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>
> 
> If we're runtime suspended and try to use the plane interfaces, we
> will get a lot of WARNs saying we did the wrong thing.
> 
> We need to get runtime PM references to pin the objects, and to
> change the fences. The pin functions are the ideal places for
> this, but intel_crtc_cursor_set_obj() doesn't call them, so we also
> have to add get/put calls inside it. There is no problem if we runtime
> suspend right after these functions are finished, because the
> registers written are forwarded to system memory.
> 
> Note: for a complete fix of the cursor-dpms test case, we also need
> the patch named "drm/i915: Don't try to enable cursor from setplane
> when crtc is disabled".
> 
> v2: - Narrow the put/get calls on intel_crtc_cursor_set_obj() (Daniel)
> v3: - Make get/put also surround the fence and unpin calls (Daniel and
>       Ville).
>     - Merge all the plane changes into a single patch since they're
>       the same fix.
>     - Add the comment requested by Daniel.
> v4: - Remove spurious whitespace (Ville).
> v5: - Remove intel_crtc_update_cursor() chunk since Ville did an
>       equivalent fix in another patch (Ville).
> v6: - Remove unpin chunk: it will be on a separate patch (Ville,
>       Chris, Daniel).
> v7: - Same thing, new color.
> 
> Testcase: igt/pm_rpm/cursor
> Testcase: igt/pm_rpm/cursor-dpms
> Testcase: igt/pm_rpm/legacy-planes
> Testcase: igt/pm_rpm/legacy-planes-dpms
> Testcase: igt/pm_rpm/universal-planes
> Testcase: igt/pm_rpm/universal-planes-dpms
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81645
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82603
> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 3f8e037..15fe3eb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -2201,6 +2201,15 @@ intel_pin_and_fence_fb_obj(struct drm_device *dev,
>  	if (need_vtd_wa(dev) && alignment < 256 * 1024)
>  		alignment = 256 * 1024;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Global gtt pte registers are special registers which actually forward
> +	 * writes to a chunk of system memory. Which means that there is no risk
> +	 * that the register values disappear as soon as we call
> +	 * intel_runtime_pm_put(), so it is correct to wrap only the
> +	 * pin/unpin/fence and not more.
> +	 */
> +	intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
> +
>  	dev_priv->mm.interruptible = false;
>  	ret = i915_gem_object_pin_to_display_plane(obj, alignment, pipelined);
>  	if (ret)
> @@ -2218,12 +2227,14 @@ intel_pin_and_fence_fb_obj(struct drm_device *dev,
>  	i915_gem_object_pin_fence(obj);
>  
>  	dev_priv->mm.interruptible = true;
> +	intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
>  	return 0;
>  
>  err_unpin:
>  	i915_gem_object_unpin_from_display_plane(obj);
>  err_interruptible:
>  	dev_priv->mm.interruptible = true;
> +	intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> @@ -8253,6 +8264,7 @@ static int intel_crtc_cursor_set_obj(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>  				     uint32_t width, uint32_t height)
>  {
>  	struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev;
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>  	struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
>  	enum pipe pipe = intel_crtc->pipe;
>  	unsigned old_width, stride;
> @@ -8292,6 +8304,15 @@ static int intel_crtc_cursor_set_obj(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>  			goto fail_locked;
>  		}
>  
> +		/*
> +		 * Global gtt pte registers are special registers which actually
> +		 * forward writes to a chunk of system memory. Which means that
> +		 * there is no risk that the register values disappear as soon
> +		 * as we call intel_runtime_pm_put(), so it is correct to wrap
> +		 * only the pin/unpin/fence and not more.
> +		 */
> +		intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
> +
>  		/* Note that the w/a also requires 2 PTE of padding following
>  		 * the bo. We currently fill all unused PTE with the shadow
>  		 * page and so we should always have valid PTE following the
> @@ -8304,16 +8325,20 @@ static int intel_crtc_cursor_set_obj(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>  		ret = i915_gem_object_pin_to_display_plane(obj, alignment, NULL);
>  		if (ret) {
>  			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("failed to move cursor bo into the GTT\n");
> +			intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
>  			goto fail_locked;
>  		}
>  
>  		ret = i915_gem_object_put_fence(obj);
>  		if (ret) {
>  			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("failed to release fence for cursor");
> +			intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
>  			goto fail_unpin;
>  		}
>  
>  		addr = i915_gem_obj_ggtt_offset(obj);
> +
> +		intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
>  	} else {
>  		int align = IS_I830(dev) ? 16 * 1024 : 256;
>  		ret = i915_gem_object_attach_phys(obj, align);
> -- 
> 2.0.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list