[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/3] lib: Add swap() macro

Jani Nikula jani.nikula at linux.intel.com
Fri Dec 5 09:39:25 PST 2014


On Fri, 05 Dec 2014, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 06:44:19PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Fri, 05 Dec 2014, ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com wrote:
>> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>> >
>> > swap() will swap its two arguments while keeping the required
>> > tmp variable hidden. Makes for neater code.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>> > ---
>> >  lib/igt_aux.h | 6 ++++++
>> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/lib/igt_aux.h b/lib/igt_aux.h
>> > index 6c83c53..63e1b06 100644
>> > --- a/lib/igt_aux.h
>> > +++ b/lib/igt_aux.h
>> > @@ -90,4 +90,10 @@ void intel_require_memory(uint32_t count, uint32_t size, unsigned mode);
>> >  #define min(a, b) ((a) < (b) ? (a) : (b))
>> >  #define max(a, b) ((a) > (b) ? (a) : (b))
>> >  
>> > +#define swap(a, b) do {		\
>> > +	typeof(a) _tmp = (a);	\
>> > +	(a) = (b);		\
>> > +	(b) = _tmp;		\
>> > +} while (0)
>> 
>> Nitpick, make the macro take pointers instead, and amend the cocci patch
>> accordingly? To a grumpy old C coder, swap(&a, &b) is so much more
>> obvious than swap(a, b)...
>
> But then it's different than the kernel swap() we all love.

Fair enough. I'll cry a little. I'll feel better soon.


>
>> 
>> Jani.
>> 
>> 
>> > +
>> >  #endif /* IGT_AUX_H */
>> > -- 
>> > 2.0.4
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Intel-gfx mailing list
>> > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>> 
>> -- 
>> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
>
> -- 
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel OTC

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list