[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Infrastructure for supporting different GGTT views per object
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Mon Dec 15 03:23:46 PST 2014
On 12/15/2014 10:24 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 05:27:58PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
>> index de241eb..c6610bc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
>> @@ -2098,8 +2098,7 @@ i915_gem_shrink(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> /* For the unbound phase, this should be a no-op! */
>> list_for_each_entry_safe(vma, v,
>> &obj->vma_list, vma_link)
>> - if (i915_vma_unbind(vma))
>> - break;
>> + i915_vma_unbind(vma);
>
> This hunk adds a new warning. It's the 2nd time a __must_check warning
> from someone from vpg london crept through all the premerge testing. Can
> you please double-check whether you have some crazy gcc flags settings or
> something in your builders?
>
> I've dropped the hunk locally.
Yes sorry, somehow I've lost the relevant flag from Kconfig. Doesn't
matter for this hunk I suppose since it was in the air anyway.
Regards,
Tvrtko
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list