[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: use effective_size for ringbuffer calculations
shuang.he at intel.com
shuang.he at intel.com
Fri Dec 19 04:52:23 PST 2014
Tested-By: PRC QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact: shuang.he at intel.com)
-------------------------------------Summary-------------------------------------
Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied
PNV -1 364/364 363/364
ILK +1-1 364/366 364/366
SNB -1 448/450 447/450
IVB -1 497/498 496/498
BYT -1 289/289 288/289
HSW -1 563/564 562/564
BDW -1 416/417 415/417
-------------------------------------Detailed-------------------------------------
Platform Test drm-intel-nightly Series Applied
PNV igt_gem_exec_blt NRUN(6, M23M7M25)PASS(1, M25) NRUN(1, M7)
ILK igt_gem_exec_blt NRUN(7, M37M26)PASS(1, M26) NRUN(1, M37)
ILK igt_kms_flip_bcs-flip-vs-modeset-interruptible DMESG_WARN(1, M26)PASS(10, M37M26) PASS(1, M37)
SNB igt_gem_exec_blt NRUN(7, M35M22)PASS(1, M35) NRUN(1, M22)
IVB igt_gem_exec_blt NRUN(7, M34M21M4)PASS(1, M34) NRUN(1, M34)
BYT igt_gem_exec_blt NRUN(7, M48M49M50M51)PASS(1, M48) NRUN(1, M50)
HSW igt_gem_exec_blt NRUN(7, M40M20M19)PASS(1, M40) NRUN(1, M19)
BDW igt_gem_exec_blt NRUN(7, M30M28)PASS(1, M28) NRUN(1, M28)
Note: You need to pay more attention to line start with '*'
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list