[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/11] drm: Add support_bits parameter to drm_property_create_bitmask()
Sagar Arun Kamble
sagar.a.kamble at intel.com
Tue Feb 11 12:02:32 CET 2014
Reviewed-by: Sagar Kamble <sagar.a.kamble at intel.com>
Tested-by: Sagar Kamble <sagar.a.kamble at intel.com>
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 16:05 +0200, ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>
> Make drm_property_create_bitmask() a bit more generic by allowing the
> caller to specify which bits are in fact supported. This allows multiple
> callers to use the same enum list, but still create different versions
> of the same property with different list of supported bits.
>
> v2: Populate values[] array as non-sparse
> Make supported_bits 64bit
> Fix up omapdrm call site (Rob)
>
> Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen at ti.com>
> Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark at gmail.com>
> Cc: Sagar Kamble <sagar.a.kamble at intel.com>
> Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> ---
> This should also make my original "drm: Add drm_mode_create_rotation_property()"
> patch do the right thing. So patch 03/11 of the series needs to be replaced with the
> original.
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_plane.c | 5 ++++-
> include/drm/drm_crtc.h | 3 ++-
> 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
> index 3b7d32d..6e099069 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
> @@ -2906,10 +2906,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_property_create_enum);
> struct drm_property *drm_property_create_bitmask(struct drm_device *dev,
> int flags, const char *name,
> const struct drm_prop_enum_list *props,
> - int num_values)
> + int num_props,
> + uint64_t supported_bits)
> {
> struct drm_property *property;
> - int i, ret;
> + int i, ret, index = 0;
> + int num_values = hweight64(supported_bits);
>
> flags |= DRM_MODE_PROP_BITMASK;
>
> @@ -2917,8 +2919,16 @@ struct drm_property *drm_property_create_bitmask(struct drm_device *dev,
> if (!property)
> return NULL;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < num_values; i++) {
> - ret = drm_property_add_enum(property, i,
> + for (i = 0; i < num_props; i++) {
> + if (!(supported_bits & (1ULL << props[i].type)))
> + continue;
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(index >= num_values)) {
> + drm_property_destroy(dev, property);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + ret = drm_property_add_enum(property, index++,
> props[i].type,
> props[i].name);
> if (ret) {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_plane.c
> index 046d5e6..0d97650 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_plane.c
> @@ -309,7 +309,10 @@ void omap_plane_install_properties(struct drm_plane *plane,
> { DRM_REFLECT_Y, "reflect-y" },
> };
> prop = drm_property_create_bitmask(dev, 0, "rotation",
> - props, ARRAY_SIZE(props));
> + props, ARRAY_SIZE(props),
> + BIT(DRM_ROTATE_0) | BIT(DRM_ROTATE_90) |
> + BIT(DRM_ROTATE_180) | BIT(DRM_ROTATE_270) |
> + BIT(DRM_REFLECT_X) | BIT(DRM_REFLECT_Y));
> if (prop == NULL)
> return;
> priv->rotation_prop = prop;
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_crtc.h b/include/drm/drm_crtc.h
> index d5c46c1..4e6d2aa 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_crtc.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_crtc.h
> @@ -1070,7 +1070,8 @@ extern struct drm_property *drm_property_create_enum(struct drm_device *dev, int
> struct drm_property *drm_property_create_bitmask(struct drm_device *dev,
> int flags, const char *name,
> const struct drm_prop_enum_list *props,
> - int num_values);
> + int num_props,
> + uint64_t supported_bits);
> struct drm_property *drm_property_create_range(struct drm_device *dev, int flags,
> const char *name,
> uint64_t min, uint64_t max);
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list