[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/19] drm/i915: sanity check power well sw state against hw state
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Tue Feb 18 17:55:45 CET 2014
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:02:17AM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> Suggested by Daniel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index e81e7de..21ccf89 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -5338,6 +5338,24 @@ static void hsw_power_well_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> hsw_enable_package_c8(dev_priv);
> }
>
> +static void check_power_well_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> + struct i915_power_well *power_well)
> +{
> + bool enabled;
> +
> + if (!power_well->ops->is_enabled)
> + return;
> +
> + enabled = power_well->ops->is_enabled(dev_priv, power_well);
> +
> + if (enabled != (power_well->count > 0 || !i915.disable_power_well)) {
Doesn't i915.disable_power_well==true mean "leave power wells always
enabled"? So I think the '!' needs to be removed.
> + DRM_ERROR("state mismatch for '%s' (hw state %d use-count %d disable_power_well %d\n",
> + power_well->name, enabled, power_well->count,
> + i915.disable_power_well);
> + WARN_ON(1);
> + }
For an error message + backtrace, you could just use WARN().
> +}
> +
> void intel_display_power_get(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> enum intel_display_power_domain domain)
> {
> @@ -5349,9 +5367,14 @@ void intel_display_power_get(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>
> mutex_lock(&power_domains->lock);
>
> - for_each_power_well(i, power_well, BIT(domain), power_domains)
> - if (!power_well->count++ && power_well->ops->enable)
> + for_each_power_well(i, power_well, BIT(domain), power_domains) {
> + if (!power_well->count++ && power_well->ops->enable) {
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("enabling %s\n", power_well->name);
> power_well->ops->enable(dev_priv, power_well);
> + }
> +
> + check_power_well_state(dev_priv, power_well);
> + }
>
> power_domains->domain_use_count[domain]++;
>
> @@ -5376,8 +5399,12 @@ void intel_display_power_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> WARN_ON(!power_well->count);
>
> if (!--power_well->count && power_well->ops->disable &&
> - i915.disable_power_well)
> + i915.disable_power_well) {
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("disabling %s\n", power_well->name);
> power_well->ops->disable(dev_priv, power_well);
> + }
> +
> + check_power_well_state(dev_priv, power_well);
> }
>
> mutex_unlock(&power_domains->lock);
> --
> 1.8.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list