[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/11] drm/i915: Rename and comment all the RPS *stuff*

Chris Wilson chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Sat Feb 22 14:37:16 CET 2014


On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 07:01:44PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> The names of the struct members for RPS are stupid. Every time I need to
> do anything in this code I have to spend a significant amount of time to
> remember what it all means. By renaming the variables (and adding the
> comments) I hope to clear up the situation. Indeed doing this make some
> upcoming patches more readable.
> 
> I've avoided ILK because it's possible that the naming used for Ironlake
> matches what is in the docs. I believe the ILK power docs were never
> published, and I am too lazy to dig them up.
> 
> While there may be mistakes, this patch was mostly done via sed. The
> renaming of "hw_max" required a bit of interactivity.

It lost the distinction between RPe and RPn. I am in favour of keeping
RP0, RP1, RPe, RPn for the hardware/spec values and adding the set of
soft values used for actual interaction.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list