[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: move intel_hrawclk() to intel_display.c
Jani Nikula
jani.nikula at intel.com
Tue Jan 7 17:46:07 CET 2014
On Tue, 07 Jan 2014, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 06:01:33PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Make it available outside of intel_dp.c.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
>
> Since this only really applies to gmch platforms I wonder whether we
> should give this a more platforms specific prefix. Established precedence
> would point towardy i9xx_ I think ... But I'm happy with other colors,
> too. Maybe a patch on top of this series for less fuzz?
Good point, will do (once we have this cleared up).
BR,
Jani.
> -Daniel
>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 34 ----------------------------------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 1 +
>> 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> index a562eef..e784feb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> @@ -78,6 +78,39 @@ intel_pch_rawclk(struct drm_device *dev)
>> return I915_READ(PCH_RAWCLK_FREQ) & RAWCLK_FREQ_MASK;
>> }
>>
>> +/* hrawclock is 1/4 the FSB frequency */
>> +int intel_hrawclk(struct drm_device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>> + uint32_t clkcfg;
>> +
>> + /* There is no CLKCFG reg in Valleyview. VLV hrawclk is 200 MHz */
>> + if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev))
>> + return 200;
>> +
>> + clkcfg = I915_READ(CLKCFG);
>> + switch (clkcfg & CLKCFG_FSB_MASK) {
>> + case CLKCFG_FSB_400:
>> + return 100;
>> + case CLKCFG_FSB_533:
>> + return 133;
>> + case CLKCFG_FSB_667:
>> + return 166;
>> + case CLKCFG_FSB_800:
>> + return 200;
>> + case CLKCFG_FSB_1067:
>> + return 266;
>> + case CLKCFG_FSB_1333:
>> + return 333;
>> + /* these two are just a guess; one of them might be right */
>> + case CLKCFG_FSB_1600:
>> + case CLKCFG_FSB_1600_ALT:
>> + return 400;
>> + default:
>> + return 133;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> static inline u32 /* units of 100MHz */
>> intel_fdi_link_freq(struct drm_device *dev)
>> {
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> index 7df5085..a36a2a3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> @@ -203,40 +203,6 @@ unpack_aux(uint32_t src, uint8_t *dst, int dst_bytes)
>> dst[i] = src >> ((3-i) * 8);
>> }
>>
>> -/* hrawclock is 1/4 the FSB frequency */
>> -static int
>> -intel_hrawclk(struct drm_device *dev)
>> -{
>> - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>> - uint32_t clkcfg;
>> -
>> - /* There is no CLKCFG reg in Valleyview. VLV hrawclk is 200 MHz */
>> - if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev))
>> - return 200;
>> -
>> - clkcfg = I915_READ(CLKCFG);
>> - switch (clkcfg & CLKCFG_FSB_MASK) {
>> - case CLKCFG_FSB_400:
>> - return 100;
>> - case CLKCFG_FSB_533:
>> - return 133;
>> - case CLKCFG_FSB_667:
>> - return 166;
>> - case CLKCFG_FSB_800:
>> - return 200;
>> - case CLKCFG_FSB_1067:
>> - return 266;
>> - case CLKCFG_FSB_1333:
>> - return 333;
>> - /* these two are just a guess; one of them might be right */
>> - case CLKCFG_FSB_1600:
>> - case CLKCFG_FSB_1600_ALT:
>> - return 400;
>> - default:
>> - return 133;
>> - }
>> -}
>> -
>> static void
>> intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer(struct drm_device *dev,
>> struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> index 46aea6c..9c5e984 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> @@ -626,6 +626,7 @@ void intel_ddi_get_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>>
>> /* intel_display.c */
>> int intel_pch_rawclk(struct drm_device *dev);
>> +int intel_hrawclk(struct drm_device *dev);
>> void intel_mark_busy(struct drm_device *dev);
>> void intel_mark_fb_busy(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>> struct intel_ring_buffer *ring);
>> --
>> 1.7.10.4
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list