[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: fix wrong PLL debug messages.

Damien Lespiau damien.lespiau at intel.com
Wed Jan 8 15:51:13 CET 2014


On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 11:12:28AM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>
> 
> LPT does have PCH refclk, but it's different form the IBX/CPT/PPT one
> and doesn't use the same structs. It is wrong to have a message saying
> that "LPT does not has PCH refclk" (sic). While at it, signal that we
> only want this function on IBX/CPT/PPT by renaming it and adding a
> WARN.
> 
> On HSW we also print "0 shared PLLs initialized", but we *do* have
> shared PLLs on HSW (LCPLL, WRPLL, SPLL) and we *do* initialize them.
> We just don't use "struct intel_shared_dpll". So remove the debug
> message.
> 
> In the future we may want to rename all that "intel shared pll" code
> to "ibx shared pll", but I'll leave this to another patch.

I remember Daniel saying that his plan was to make the DDI clocks use
the shared PLL struct. I guess that'd take care of the debug message
correctness.

So I defer this one to higher authorities, you have my r-b tag as the
patch makes sense, not sure if Daniel will take it though :)

> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 11 +++--------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 034952c..df3cf69 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -1211,15 +1211,12 @@ static void assert_sprites_disabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static void assert_pch_refclk_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +static void ibx_assert_pch_refclk_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
>  	u32 val;
>  	bool enabled;
>  
> -	if (HAS_PCH_LPT(dev_priv->dev)) {
> -		DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("LPT does not has PCH refclk, skipping check\n");
> -		return;
> -	}
> +	WARN_ON(!(HAS_PCH_IBX(dev_priv->dev) || HAS_PCH_CPT(dev_priv->dev)));
>  
>  	val = I915_READ(PCH_DREF_CONTROL);
>  	enabled = !!(val & (DREF_SSC_SOURCE_MASK | DREF_NONSPREAD_SOURCE_MASK |
> @@ -10067,7 +10064,7 @@ static void ibx_pch_dpll_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  				struct intel_shared_dpll *pll)
>  {
>  	/* PCH refclock must be enabled first */
> -	assert_pch_refclk_enabled(dev_priv);
> +	ibx_assert_pch_refclk_enabled(dev_priv);
>  
>  	I915_WRITE(PCH_DPLL(pll->id), pll->hw_state.dpll);
>  
> @@ -10135,8 +10132,6 @@ static void intel_shared_dpll_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>  		dev_priv->num_shared_dpll = 0;
>  
>  	BUG_ON(dev_priv->num_shared_dpll > I915_NUM_PLLS);
> -	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%i shared PLLs initialized\n",
> -		      dev_priv->num_shared_dpll);
>  }
>  
>  static void intel_crtc_init(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe)
> -- 
> 1.8.4.2
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list