[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: reset eDP timestamps on resume
Jesse Barnes
jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org
Wed Jan 15 19:21:56 CET 2014
On Fri, 3 Jan 2014 17:46:40 -0200
Paulo Zanoni <przanoni at gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>
>
> The eDP code records a few timestamps containing the last time we took
> some actions, because we need to wait before doing some other actions.
> The problem is that if we store a timestamp when suspending and then
> look at it when resuming, we'll ignore the unknown amount of time we
> actually were suspended.
>
> This happens with the panel power cycle delay: it's 500ms on my
> machine, and it's delaying the resume sequence by 200ms due to a
> timestamp we recorded before suspending. This patch should solve this
> problem by resetting the timestamps, creating encoder->resume()
> callbacks.
>
> Q: Why don't we use DRM's connector->reset() callback?
> A: Because it is also called then the driver is loaded, and it's on a point
> where we have already used the panel, so we can't just reset any of the
> timtestamps there.
>
> v2: - Fix the madatory jiffies/milliseconds bug.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 2 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 11 +++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 3 +++
> 5 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> index 61fb9fc..4aa42e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> @@ -649,6 +649,8 @@ static int __i915_drm_thaw(struct drm_device *dev, bool restore_gtt_mappings)
>
> mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
>
> + intel_encoder_resume(dev);
> +
> error = i915_gem_init_hw(dev);
> mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> index 1488b28..527e89c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> @@ -1606,6 +1606,7 @@ void intel_ddi_init(struct drm_device *dev, enum port port)
> intel_encoder->post_disable = intel_ddi_post_disable;
> intel_encoder->get_hw_state = intel_ddi_get_hw_state;
> intel_encoder->get_config = intel_ddi_get_config;
> + intel_encoder->resume = intel_dp_resume;
>
> intel_dig_port->port = port;
> intel_dig_port->saved_port_bits = I915_READ(DDI_BUF_CTL(port)) &
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 4d1357a..869be78 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -11096,6 +11096,17 @@ void i915_redisable_vga(struct drm_device *dev)
> }
> }
>
> +void intel_encoder_resume(struct drm_device *dev)
> +{
> + struct intel_encoder *encoder;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(encoder, &dev->mode_config.encoder_list,
> + base.head) {
> + if (encoder->resume)
> + encoder->resume(encoder);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static void intel_modeset_readout_hw_state(struct drm_device *dev)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index 2f82af4..dafb204 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -3393,6 +3393,27 @@ intel_dp_add_properties(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, struct drm_connector *connect
> }
> }
>
> +void intel_dp_resume(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> +{
> + struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(&encoder->base);
> + unsigned long tmp_jiffies = jiffies;
> +
> + if (!is_edp(intel_dp))
> + return;
> +
> + /*
> + * Reset everything, otherwise when suspend/resume gets very fast, we
> + * delay the resume based on the values that were set when we were still
> + * suspending.
> + */
> + intel_dp->last_power_on = tmp_jiffies -
> + msecs_to_jiffies(intel_dp->backlight_on_delay);
> + intel_dp->last_power_cycle = tmp_jiffies -
> + msecs_to_jiffies(intel_dp->panel_power_cycle_delay);
> + intel_dp->last_backlight_off = tmp_jiffies -
> + msecs_to_jiffies(intel_dp->backlight_off_delay);
> +}
> +
> static void
> intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer(struct drm_device *dev,
> struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> @@ -3784,6 +3805,7 @@ intel_dp_init(struct drm_device *dev, int output_reg, enum port port)
> intel_encoder->post_disable = intel_post_disable_dp;
> intel_encoder->get_hw_state = intel_dp_get_hw_state;
> intel_encoder->get_config = intel_dp_get_config;
> + intel_encoder->resume = intel_dp_resume;
> if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev)) {
> intel_encoder->pre_pll_enable = vlv_dp_pre_pll_enable;
> intel_encoder->pre_enable = vlv_pre_enable_dp;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index 92de688..8fb6dbe 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ struct intel_encoder {
> * be set correctly before calling this function. */
> void (*get_config)(struct intel_encoder *,
> struct intel_crtc_config *pipe_config);
> + void (*resume)(struct intel_encoder *);
> int crtc_mask;
> enum hpd_pin hpd_pin;
> };
> @@ -711,6 +712,7 @@ void hsw_enable_ips(struct intel_crtc *crtc);
> void hsw_disable_ips(struct intel_crtc *crtc);
> void intel_display_set_init_power(struct drm_device *dev, bool enable);
> int valleyview_get_vco(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> +void intel_encoder_resume(struct drm_device *dev);
>
> /* intel_dp.c */
> void intel_dp_init(struct drm_device *dev, int output_reg, enum port port);
> @@ -734,6 +736,7 @@ void ironlake_edp_panel_vdd_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, bool sync);
> void intel_edp_psr_enable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> void intel_edp_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> void intel_edp_psr_update(struct drm_device *dev);
> +void intel_dp_resume(struct intel_encoder *encoder);
>
>
> /* intel_dsi.c */
Looks good. I wonder if the resume call could be put into
modeset_init_hw somehow, or maybe a new modeset_resume_hw routine or
something, since the resume placement above the gem init seems odd, but
that's not a blocker by any means.
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org>
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list