[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/28] drm/i915: WaDisableRCCUnitClockGating isn't applicable to IVB
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Tue Jan 28 13:29:41 CET 2014
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:18:48AM -0200, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> For this and next one: According to wa_database this wa seems relevant
> for all gt, right?
snb is called gt in w/a database language, or did you mean something else?
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 5:32 PM, <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> >
> > WaDisableRCCUnitClockGating is only relevant for SNB.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 6 +-----
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > index f40dd1b..1e1c1b1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > @@ -4860,15 +4860,11 @@ static void ivybridge_init_clock_gating(struct drm_device *dev)
> > * Sanctuary and Tropics, and apparently anything else with
> > * alpha test or pixel discard.
> > *
> > - * According to the spec, bit 11 (RCCUNIT) must also be set,
> > - * but we didn't debug actual testcases to find it out.
> > - *
> > * According to the spec, bit 13 (RCZUNIT) must be set on IVB.
> > * This implements the WaDisableRCZUnitClockGating:ivb workaround.
> > */
> > I915_WRITE(GEN6_UCGCTL2,
> > - GEN6_RCZUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE |
> > - GEN6_RCCUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE);
> > + GEN6_RCZUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE);
> >
> > /* This is required by WaCatErrorRejectionIssue:ivb */
> > I915_WRITE(GEN7_SQ_CHICKEN_MBCUNIT_CONFIG,
> > --
> > 1.8.3.2
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
>
>
> --
> Rodrigo Vivi
> Blog: http://blog.vivi.eng.br
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list