[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Get rid of acthd based guilty batch search
Mika Kuoppala
mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com
Wed Jan 29 16:05:39 CET 2014
As we seek the guilty batch using request and hangcheck
score, this code is not needed anymore.
Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 91 ++-------------------------------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index a46a1a7..8637898 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -2241,70 +2241,6 @@ i915_gem_request_remove_from_client(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
spin_unlock(&file_priv->mm.lock);
}
-static bool i915_head_inside_object(u32 acthd, struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
- struct i915_address_space *vm)
-{
- if (acthd >= i915_gem_obj_offset(obj, vm) &&
- acthd < i915_gem_obj_offset(obj, vm) + obj->base.size)
- return true;
-
- return false;
-}
-
-static bool i915_head_inside_request(const u32 acthd_unmasked,
- const u32 request_start,
- const u32 request_end)
-{
- const u32 acthd = acthd_unmasked & HEAD_ADDR;
-
- if (request_start < request_end) {
- if (acthd >= request_start && acthd < request_end)
- return true;
- } else if (request_start > request_end) {
- if (acthd >= request_start || acthd < request_end)
- return true;
- }
-
- return false;
-}
-
-static struct i915_address_space *
-request_to_vm(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
-{
- struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = request->ring->dev->dev_private;
- struct i915_address_space *vm;
-
- if (request->ctx)
- vm = request->ctx->vm;
- else
- vm = &dev_priv->gtt.base;
-
- return vm;
-}
-
-static bool i915_request_guilty(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request,
- const u32 acthd, bool *inside)
-{
- /* There is a possibility that unmasked head address
- * pointing inside the ring, matches the batch_obj address range.
- * However this is extremely unlikely.
- */
- if (request->batch_obj) {
- if (i915_head_inside_object(acthd, request->batch_obj,
- request_to_vm(request))) {
- *inside = true;
- return true;
- }
- }
-
- if (i915_head_inside_request(acthd, request->head, request->tail)) {
- *inside = false;
- return true;
- }
-
- return false;
-}
-
static bool i915_context_is_banned(const struct i915_hw_context *ctx)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv;
@@ -2329,30 +2265,11 @@ static bool i915_context_is_banned(const struct i915_hw_context *ctx)
return false;
}
-static void i915_set_reset_status(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
- struct drm_i915_gem_request *request,
- const bool guilty)
+static void i915_set_reset_status(struct i915_hw_context *ctx,
+ const bool guilty)
{
- const u32 acthd = intel_ring_get_active_head(ring);
- bool inside;
- unsigned long offset = 0;
- struct i915_hw_context *ctx = request->ctx;
struct i915_ctx_hang_stats *hs;
- if (request->batch_obj)
- offset = i915_gem_obj_offset(request->batch_obj,
- request_to_vm(request));
-
- if (guilty &&
- i915_request_guilty(request, acthd, &inside)) {
- DRM_DEBUG("%s hung %s bo (0x%lx ctx %d) at 0x%x\n",
- ring->name,
- inside ? "inside" : "flushing",
- offset,
- ctx ? ctx->id : 0,
- acthd);
- }
-
if (WARN_ON(!ctx))
return;
@@ -2407,10 +2324,10 @@ static void i915_gem_reset_ring_status(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
ring_hung = ring->hangcheck.score >= HANGCHECK_SCORE_RING_HUNG;
- i915_set_reset_status(ring, request, ring_hung);
+ i915_set_reset_status(request->ctx, ring_hung);
list_for_each_entry_continue(request, &ring->request_list, list)
- i915_set_reset_status(ring, request, false);
+ i915_set_reset_status(request->ctx, false);
}
static void i915_gem_reset_ring_cleanup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
--
1.7.9.5
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list