[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] intel: Merge i915_drm.h with cmd parser define

[Volkin, Bradley D]

On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 01:20:57AM -0800, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 02:26:12PM -0800, Volkin, Bradley D wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 02:13:21PM -0800, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 01:57:28PM -0800, bradley.d.volkin at intel.com wrote:
> > > > From: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.volkin at intel.com>
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.volkin at intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  include/drm/i915_drm.h | 5 +++--
> > > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/include/drm/i915_drm.h b/include/drm/i915_drm.h
> > > > index 2f4eb8c..ba863c4 100644
> > > > --- a/include/drm/i915_drm.h
> > > > +++ b/include/drm/i915_drm.h
> > > > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
> > > >  #ifndef _I915_DRM_H_
> > > >  #define _I915_DRM_H_
> > > >  
> > > > -#include <drm.h>
> > > > +#include <drm/drm.h>
> > > 
> > > Something about this patch smells very fishy....
> > 
> > Yeah, I wasn't completely sure about this one. I followed what I thought was
> > the procedure for updating the header (i.e. make headers_install in kernel,
> > copy to libdrm) and this is what I got.
> 
> I guess either works, so maybe just add a note to the commit message about
> the little change. Imo it's better to have a 1:1 copy of the header
> generated by the kernel.

Sorry, I'm a bit confused. Did I follow the right procedure for updating
the header?

> -Daniel
> -- 
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch