[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Increase OpRegion timeout

Jani Nikula jani.nikula at linux.intel.com
Fri Jan 31 12:42:26 CET 2014


On Fri, 31 Jan 2014, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> wrote:
> I have a machine here which hits this (a g33):
>
> [   13.368536] excessive driver sleep timeout (DSPL) 1024
>
> Apparently people love pot numbers, and one second isn't that
> unreasonable (for a bios writer at least) I guess.

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>

> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c
> index 3da259e280ba..3c7e38c7ed87 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c
> @@ -261,10 +261,10 @@ static int swsci(struct drm_device *dev, u32 function, u32 parm, u32 *parm_out)
>  		/* The spec says 2ms should be the default, but it's too small
>  		 * for some machines. */
>  		dslp = 50;
> -	} else if (dslp > 500) {
> +	} else if (dslp > 1500) {
>  		/* Hey bios, trust must be earned. */
>  		WARN_ONCE(1, "excessive driver sleep timeout (DSPL) %u\n", dslp);
> -		dslp = 500;
> +		dslp = 1500;
>  	}
>  
>  	/* The spec tells us to do this, but we are the only user... */
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list