[Intel-gfx] [v2 00/11] Support for 180 degree HW rotation

Jindal, Sonika sonika.jindal at intel.com
Sun Jul 6 10:11:12 CEST 2014



On 7/4/2014 8:36 PM, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 03:13:52PM +0530, sonika.jindal at intel.com wrote:
>> From: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal at intel.com>
>>
>> Enables 180 degree rotation for sprite and primary planes.
>> Updated the primary plane rotation support as per the new universal plane
>> design.
>>
>> Most of these patches were already reviewed in intel-gfx in February 2014 thats
>> why there is version history in few of them.
>>
>> v2: Moved rotation_property to drm_plane. Added updation of FBC when rotation is
>> again set to 0.
>>
>> Testcase: kms_rotation_crc
>> This igt can be extended for clipped rotation cases. Right it only tests 180
>> degree rotation for sprite and primary plane with crc check.
>>
>>
>> Sonika Jindal (2):
>>    drm/i915: Add 180 degree primary plane rotation support
>>    drm: Resetting rotation property
>>
>> Ville Syrjälä (9):
>>    drm: Move DRM_ROTATE bits out of omapdrm into drm_crtc.h
>>    drm: Add support_bits parameter to drm_property_create_bitmask()
>>    drm: Add drm_mode_create_rotation_property()
>>    drm/omap: Switch omapdrm over to drm_mode_create_rotation_property()
>>    drm: Add drm_rect rotation functions
>>    drm: Add drm_rotation_simplify()
>>    drm/i915: Add 180 degree sprite rotation support
>>    drm/i915: Make intel_plane_restore() return an error
>>    drm/i915: Add rotation property for sprites
>
> Missing from this series, your two documentation patches (we need to
> bundle things up as a entity that makes sense for one of the maintainers
> to pick it up (either Dave or Daniel)).
>
I was not aware that documentation patches should also be part of this.
Because I was asked to send the igt testcase separately I thought 
documentation will also go separately. Documentation patches have also 
got reviewed-by tags. What do you suggest? Should I send the patchset 
again with documentation? Will Igt still be a separate post?



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list