[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/5] drm/i915: Implement a framework for batch buffer pools
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Wed Jul 9 09:32:13 CEST 2014
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 03:26:36PM -0700, bradley.d.volkin at intel.com wrote:
> +void i915_gem_batch_pool_fini(struct i915_gem_batch_pool *pool)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, *next;
> +
> + WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&pool->dev->struct_mutex));
> + WARN_ON(!list_empty(&pool->active_list));
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(obj, next,
> + &pool->inactive_list, batch_pool_list) {
> + list_del(&obj->batch_pool_list);
> + drm_gem_object_unreference(&obj->base);
> + }
Cleanup loops are idiomatically: while (!list_empty()) { }
> +struct drm_i915_gem_object *
> +i915_gem_batch_pool_get(struct i915_gem_batch_pool *pool,
> + size_t size)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = NULL;
> + struct drm_i915_gem_object *tmp;
> +
> + WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&pool->dev->struct_mutex));
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(tmp, &pool->inactive_list, batch_pool_list) {
> + if (tmp->base.size >= size) {
A general rule-of-thumb we use elsewhere is not to hand back an object
that is greater than 2x the request. If you want to be generic, you
could change size to min_size, max_size.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list