[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/4] core: Free buffer allocated with vasprintf()

Daniel Vetter daniel at ffwll.ch
Wed Jul 9 14:14:37 CEST 2014


On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 01:06:08PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 01:56:02PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 11:45:18AM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> > > We were leaking a bit.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau at intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  lib/igt_core.c | 2 ++
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/lib/igt_core.c b/lib/igt_core.c
> > > index 7ac7ebe..364cdd0 100644
> > > --- a/lib/igt_core.c
> > > +++ b/lib/igt_core.c
> > > @@ -591,6 +591,8 @@ void __igt_skip_check(const char *file, const int line,
> > >  			 "Last errno: %i, %s\n"
> > >  			 "Test requirement: (%s)\n%s",
> > >  			 func, file, line, err, strerror(err), check, buf);
> > > +
> > > +		free(buf);
> > 
> > igt_skip is noreturn, i.e. this adds dead code. No idea how this fix this
> > without causing a mess.
> > 
> > /me summons the devil and wishes for a garbage collector
> 
> Oh well, if it's no return it'll be freed for us anwyay. Will push the
> other ones with the free removed in the last one.

Well it does a longjump and will continue execution with the next subtest.
It's only a process exit if this isn't a subtest igt binary.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list